Sharma, Lamba yet to iron out issues

June 11, 2016 12:00 am | Updated October 18, 2016 02:50 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

No solution:The matter remains stuck on whether O.P. Sharma should apologise before the Assembly, or if both legislators should apologise to each other.File photos

No solution:The matter remains stuck on whether O.P. Sharma should apologise before the Assembly, or if both legislators should apologise to each other.File photos

An amicable solution to the row between BJP MLA O. P. Sharma and AAP’s Alka Lamba is still awaited.

Both Mr. Sharma and Ms. Lamba appeared with their counsels in the Delhi High Court on Thursday, but despite efforts the issue remained unresolved.

The matter remains stuck on whether Mr. Sharma should apologise before the Assembly, or if both legislators should apologise to each other.

Justice Manmohan Singh took up the matter in his chamber, a day after he asked both legislators to come to the court “with an open mind”.

AAP MLA wants apology

On Thursday, Ms. Lamba had insisted that the BJP MLA apologise for his derogatory comment, while Mr. Sharma said he was ready to say sorry only if it was mutual.

After several rounds of discussions but no resolution, the matter was fixed for arguments on Friday.

“A unilateral apology is not going to happen. Ms. Lamba is also saying that he (Sharma) should apologise before the Assembly, but submitting to the jurisdiction of the Assembly is not possible as it has already taken its decision in suspending him from the next two sessions. That is what we have challenged in our petition,” said senior advocate Ama Lekhi on behalf of the BJP MLA.

Counsel speak

“Earlier, it was jointly agreed that both sides will withdraw their statements, but Ms. Lamba is now seeking a unilateral apology, which is not going to be there,” said Mr. Lekhi.

While Mr. Sharma stands suspended from the House for the next two sessions, he insisted that he was making a statement in response to Ms. Lamba’s ‘ nashe ke saudagar ’ comment.

On Wednesday, he had moved the High Court challenging his suspension from the next two sessions of the House, saying it was illegal and ultra vires. He said he was moving the court because he was keen on attending the session starting on Thursday.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.