SC wraps up hearing on Delhi-Centre power spat

Constitution Bench reserves case for judgment

December 07, 2017 01:41 am | Updated 03:24 pm IST - NEW DELHI

The AAP government had challenged an HC judgment declaring the L-G as the sole administrator of Delhi.

The AAP government had challenged an HC judgment declaring the L-G as the sole administrator of Delhi.

A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved for judgment the Centre-Delhi power tussle over who between them wields the power of administration and governance over the Capital.

Over a month after it commenced hearing the batch of appeals filed by the Delhi government, the Bench led by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra wrapped up the hearing after rejoinder arguments of senior advocates Gopal Subramanium and Rajeev Dhawan for the Delhi government.

The Bench also comprised Justices A. K. Sikri, A. M. Khanwilkar, D. Y. Chandrachud and Ashok Bhushan. The Arvind Kejriwal-led Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government had challenged the Delhi High Court judgment declaring the Lieutenant-Governor (L-G) as the sole administrator of Delhi.

69th Amendment

The Delhi government was represented by a galaxy of senior counsel, including P. Chidambaram and Indira Jaising. The Centre was represented by Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh, who had argued that Delhi government cannot stake any claim to have executive power over the Capital.

Mr. Subramanium emphasised that the 69th Constitutional amendment giving the people of Delhi an elected government and a legislature was based on the fundamental principles of egalitarianism.

Mr. Dhawan argued that the court should not narrowly interpret a constitutional amendment, which actually enhances the fundamental rights of democracy in consonance with the 'Basic Structure' doctrine introduced by a 13-judge Bench in the historic Keshavananda Bharati case.

He argued that the status and powers bestowed in the constitutional amendment should be read organically in its entirety and not selectively. The powers of the President, the L-G, Council of Ministers in the Delhi government and the Chief Minister are inter-connected.

He argued that there was no point to comparing Delhi to any other State or Union Territory.

The 69th Amendment of the Constitution in 1992 gave the National Capital of Delhi special status with its own democratically elected government and legislative assembly. Sub-section (4) of Article 239AA mandates that a Council of Ministers shall aid and advice the LG in his functions regarding laws made by the Legislative Assembly.

The focus of the current controversy was a proviso to Article 239AA (4), which mandates that in case of a difference of opinion between the L-G and the Council of Ministers, the former has to refer the issue to the President. While that decision is pending before the President, the L-G, if the matter is urgent, can use his discretion to take immediate action.

‘L-G misused discretion’

Mr. Subramanium had alleged that the L-G has misused the discretion in this proviso to block governance to such an extent that decisions from appointment of teachers in municipal schools to opening of Mohalla Clinics have been pending for over a year. “The Chief Secretary and other officers, without applying their minds to the various welfare proposals and schemes, simply forward the files to the L-G, where it remains indeterminately,” he said.

Mr. Subramanium had argued that the “extraordinary discretion” of the L-G is confined to special circumstances and not in everything.

At one point, Chief Justice Misra had agreed that the “difference of opinion” between the L-G and the Delhi government should be “authentic” and had not meant to stultify governance.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.