SC refuses to stay order on Delhi nursery admissions

January 31, 2014 01:23 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 07:33 pm IST - New Delhi

In this December, 2013 photo, parents are seen filling the nursery admission forms at a school in New Delhi. Photo: Monica Tiwari

In this December, 2013 photo, parents are seen filling the nursery admission forms at a school in New Delhi. Photo: Monica Tiwari

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to stay the interim order on nursery admission process in the national capital but asked the Delhi High Court to expeditiously hear the pleas against the guidelines by advancing the scheduled hearing.

A bench headed by Justice H.L. Dattu said since the order of the high court was in the nature of an interim order, it was not interfering with it and asked the high court to hear the issues raised as expeditiously as possible in the interest of the schools and welfare of the children.

The apex court gave liberty to the petitioners, Action Committee of Unaided Recognised Private Schools, Forum for Promotion of Quality Education for All and some parents to make an application before the single judge of the high court for advancing the March 11 hearing.

“Since the interim order is in the nature of refusal to grant interim relief, we also do not intend to interfere with that order. Therefore, we reject the Special Leave Petition.

“We request the single judge of the high court to consider and make all endeavour as expeditiously as possible the hear the petitions in the interest of the schools and welfare of the children,” the bench also comprising S.A. Bobde said.

While giving liberty to the aggrieved parties to make an application before the single judge for advancement of March 11 hearing, the bench said “If such application is made, the single judge is requested to consider the plea and expedite the hearing.”

Disposing the appeals against the high court’s order, the bench made it clear that it is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter.

The apex court agreed with the pleas of Action Committee of Unaided Recognised Private Schools and Forum for Promotion of Quality Education for All, raising objections to a paragraph in the division bench’s verdict and expunged those lines from the judgement.

The division bench of the high court has confirmed the order passed by the single judge which had refused to stay the December 18, 2013 guidelines of the Lieutenant Governor (LG).

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.