Plea by accused in dowry harassment case dismissed

The woman, who suffers from leprosy, was harassed by husband, in-laws immediately after marriage

December 01, 2017 02:03 am | Updated 02:03 am IST - New Delhi

A Delhi court has dismissed a revision petition challenging framing of charges against a man and other members of his family for allegedly harassing a leprosy-afflicted woman for dowry.

Dismissing the petition against the framing of charges by a Metropolitan Magistrate, Additional Sessions Judge Sanjiv Jain said: “From the complaint and material available on record, I am of the view that prima facie a case under Sections 498A read with 34 [common intention] of IPC is made out against all the accused persons. I do not find any illegality or infirmity in the order of the trial court.”

Taunted

The woman has alleged in her complaint that her husband and in-laws started harassing her immediately after marriage. Stating that she suffers from leprosy, the woman added that in-laws and sister-in-law taunted her about her medical condition, and that her husband would abuse and beat her at his sister’s instigation.

She claimed that her husband and in-laws, including the sister-in-law, demanded ₹2 lakh on August 12, 2013. When she refused, they pushed her on the ground, kicked her, and also tried to strangle her using a dupatta.

“In the instant case, there are specific instances and allegations against the husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law, sister-in-law and brother-in-law of the complainant who, on one pretext or the other for want of dowry, subjected the complainant to cruelty. They also harassed her for unlawful demand of dowry. When she refused to fulfil their demands, all of them beat and harassed her. They had illegally demanded ₹20,000 for purchase of an air conditioner and ₹2 lakh from the complainant. Her sister-in-law used to instigate her husband. All of them used to taunt her,” the judge said.

“There is nothing to indicate that the impugned order is passed against natural justice and there is no evidence to support the claim of the respondent that the complaint has been filed to seek conviction of the maximum people as stated in the revision petition,” the judge said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.