Petition challenges rules for changing name, gender

HC seeks response of Centre, CBSE and DU in the matter

August 08, 2017 01:43 am | Updated 01:43 am IST - New Delhi

The Delhi High Court has sought response of the Centre, CBSE and Delhi University (DU) on a transgender’s plea challenging the guidelines of these authorities for change of name and gender by a person.

According to the petition, the university norms say that for change of name and gender, the same have to be first altered in the records of the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE).

The guidelines of the Board, on the other hand, say that request for such changes in its records would be entertained only if it is made before publication of the result, the petition has said.

The Department of Publications of the Centre requires that a sex reassignment surgery be undergone before change of name and gender, it said.

Taking note of the PIL, a Bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C. Hari Shankar issued notices to the Centre, CBSE and DU and sought their response on the petition which challenges all these requirements for change of name and gender.

The court also asked the Board why it did not take an interest in the issue and why it was not doing it [making the change] on its own.

‘No interest in issue’

“Why don’t you show your own interest in the issue? You should do it on your own,” the Bench said and listed the matter for hearing on November 27.

The petitioner was assigned the male gender at birth but identifies self as a transgender.

The plea, filed through advocate Yashraj Singh Deora, has alleged that the criteria laid down by the various authorities for change of name and gender are “arbitrary and unreasonable”.

It also claims that the Supreme Court in 2014 held that insistence on a sex reassignment surgery for declaring one’s gender was illegal and immoral.

‘Routine discrimination’

It says that the petitioner “routinely faces discrimination on account of the incongruity between the self-identified gender and the male identity given at birth”.

The petitioner has contended that the guidelines under challenge are “depriving her of the right to live with dignity and to self identify her gender, which is different from the one assigned at birth”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.