Patient beaten up: court upholds summoning of AIIMS doc

AIIMS also lodged FIR against patient, two sons; police had said no evidence against the doctors

December 28, 2017 01:19 am | Updated 03:34 pm IST - New Delhi

 The patient claimed three doctors and some security guards misbehaved with him.

The patient claimed three doctors and some security guards misbehaved with him.

A Sessions court has refused to quash an order to summon an AIIMS doctor as an accused for allegedly beating up a patient following a quarrel on refusal to provide first-aid to him in the emergency ward.

According to the complaint lodged by the patient, the doctor on duty had refused to attend to him which led to heated exchanges and use of physical force.

In his initial complaint, the patient said that three doctors and some security guards misbehaved with him and his two sons, and that one of them had slapped him. He added that the ward was then locked by the security guards and they thrashed him and his sons.

In his second complaint, however, the patient named the three doctors and accused them of attacking him.

The AIIMS administration had also lodged an FIR against the patient and his two sons.

Court order challenged

The police, however, chargesheeted only the security guards and stated that the incident had taken place at the instigation of the complainant and his sons and there was no evidence against the doctors.

But a Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) court summoned the security guards as well as the three doctors.

One of the doctors, Dr. Shreeram Mohan, had challenged the MM court order in the court of Additional Sessions Judge Rajesh Kumar Singh, submitting that a person who was not chargesheeted could be summoned only after recording of evidence.

He also challenged his summoning on the ground of alleged delay in lodging the FIR, lack of evidence and improvement in the complainant’s version.

Dismissing the revision petition of Dr. Mohan, the Judge said: “At the stage of summoning, the MM is not required to write a detailed order. The summoning order can not be interfered with, if the view taken by the MM is a possible view which could have been taken on the basis of material before him.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.