Panel tells 58 Delhi schools to refund ‘unjustly’ charged fee

March 16, 2013 11:14 am | Updated November 16, 2021 09:47 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Indicting as many as 58 private schools in the Capital for charging excess tuition fees in 2009, the Delhi High Court-appointed Justice Anil Dev Singh Committee has recommended refund of the ‘unjustly hiked’ extra amounts to the parents.

The Committee has also recommended that the unjustified or unauthorised fees charged by these schools be refunded along with 9 per cent interest per annum as mandated by the High Court.

Submitting its second interim report to a Division Bench of Justice B.D. Ahmed and Justice Siddharth Mridul on Friday, the Committee described the fee charged by these schools as ‘unjustly hiked.’

Of the 58 indicted schools, the Committee recommended special inspection of the accounts of 11 of them by the Directorate of Education of the Delhi Government. These schools have also not implemented the Sixth Pay Commission recommendations, the Committee stated.

At the same time, the financials of these schools did not inspire any confidence for a variety of reasons, the Committee added.

In respect of 47 schools, the Committee found that the fee hike effected by them in pursuance of the order issued by the Directorate of Education on February 2009 was either wholly or partially unjustified as these schools either had sufficient funds at their disposal to take care of the burden imposed by the implementation of the Sixth Pay Commission recommendations or the fee hike was more than what was required to fully absorb the pay hike.

The Committee further said that a number of schools had charged the development fee not in accordance with the criteria laid down by the Duggal Committee Report which was upheld by the Supreme Court.

While the schools were quick to charge the development fee as permitted by the Supreme Court, they turned a blind eye to the conditions of capitalisation of such fee and setting apart the funds in a separate fund and depreciation reserve fund accounts, the Committee said. In respect of 27 schools, the Committee has not been able to take a categorical view.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.