L-G backs Jung decision on repatriating Assembly Secy

Order repatriated him to parent organisation Prasar Bharati

March 22, 2017 12:59 am | Updated 07:43 am IST - New Delhi

NEW DELHI  10/01/2017:   Delhi's Lt Governor Anil Baijal during inauguration of skill development centre in night shelter at Tilak Nagar, in New Delhi  on Tuesday. Photo: Sandeep Saxena

NEW DELHI 10/01/2017: Delhi's Lt Governor Anil Baijal during inauguration of skill development centre in night shelter at Tilak Nagar, in New Delhi on Tuesday. Photo: Sandeep Saxena

Lieutenant-Governor Anil Baijal on Tuesday informed the Delhi High Court about his decision to endorse his predecessor’s order to repatriate the Secretary of the Legislative Assembly to his parent organisation Prasar Bharati.

Hearing on April 27

The court, however, didn’t hold a hearing on the plea by Delhi Assembly Speaker Ram Nival Goel against former L-G Najeeb Jung’s decision to repatriate Prasanna Kumar Suryadevara, as the court didn’t assemble for the post-lunch sitting. The matter will be heard on April 27.

The Speaker and Prasar Bharati are locked in a tug of war over Mr. Suryadevara’s repatriation.

As per the communication of Deputy Secretary (Services) of the Delhi government, which was to be produced before the court on Tuesday, Mr. Baijal had on Monday refused to differ with the decision taken by his predecessor.

“The Delhi L-G has considered the matter of repatriation and relieving of Mr. Suryadevara, and has decided that there’s no reason to differ with the earlier decision taken and issued vide order dated August 29, 2016, of Services Department, Government of NCT of Delhi, and reiterated the same,” the March 20 order read.

The order of the L-G’s Office was produced against the backdrop of the court’s earlier direction, which had left it to Mr. Baijal to decide whether or not to review the order relieving Mr. Suryadevara.

“Amicable solution”

It had decided to wait for the L-G’s decision as talks between the Speaker and the Director General of All India Radio had failed to break the impasse.

The meeting was held following the court’s suggestion to find an “amicable solution” to the issue.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.