Improper RTI information lands officer in trouble

August 25, 2010 07:45 pm | Updated 07:45 pm IST - NEW DELHI

The Central Information Commission (CIC) has issued show-cause notices to a former and an incumbent Public Information Officer (PIO) of the Delhi Government's Social Welfare Department observing that one of them appeared to have provided false information and the other had not supplied complete information within the stipulated 30 days to two RTI applicants seeking details on some officials booked in two corruption cases.

The RTI applications were filed by two representatives of NGO Pratidhi in November 2009 and in May this year.

As part of the reply to the first application, the then PIO K. K. Bhalla had informed that departmental inquiry had been initiated against the enquired officials who were arrested by the Anti-Corruption Branch of the Delhi Government on charges of misappropriation of funds meant for children homes and other institutions.

However, in reply to the second application in July this year, incumbent PIO O.P. Bhatti informed that as per the available record with the vigilance branch, no departmental inquiry was being initiated against the accused officials. The PIO further informed that the officials suspended after being booked in corruption cases were later reinstated.

When asked about any policy regarding posting of tainted officials, it was informed that there was no particular criteria.

On the grounds of non-receipt of proper information from the PIO, the second applicant Subhash Baghel then approached the CIC. Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi, in his order, directed Mr. Bhatti to provide information about the status of the departmental enquiries before August 30 this month.

Issuing show cause notice to the previous PIO, Mr. Gandhi said: “It appears that K. K. Bhalla has provided false information to the complainant.”

The Information Commissioner also issued show cause notice to Mr. Bhatti observing that he was responsible for not supplying complete information within the stipulated 30 days. Both the officials have been asked to appear before the Commission on October 1.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.