File fresh status report in graft case against Virbhadra, CBI told

The Income Tax Department submitted its report on Mr. Singh's tax assessment in a sealed cover to the Court.

August 21, 2014 08:24 am | Updated 08:24 am IST - NEW DELHI

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Central Bureau of Investigation to file a fresh status report on its probe into a case of graft, money laundering and disproportionate income against Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Virbhadra Singh. A preliminary enquiry was initiated on a complaint filed against Mr. Singh two years ago.

The order came on a public interest writ petition moved by a non-government organisation, Common Cause, which has sought a Court-monitored investigation by the CBI and the Income Tax Department into the charges levelled against Mr. Singh. The allegations relate to Mr. Singh's previous tenure as the Chief Minister and the Union Minister.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice R. S. Endlaw directed the CBI to file the report, which would reveal the status of preliminary enquiry, by September 1, when the case will come up for further hearing. The Court has not issued notices in the case so far.

The Income Tax Department submitted its report on Mr. Singh's tax assessment in a sealed cover to the Court.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Mr. Singh, contended that the PIL appeared to be a “personal interest litigation”, making frivolous charges against Mr. Singh. He said the issue of alleged income tax violations had already been raised before the Himachal Pradesh High Court.

Common Cause counsel Prashant Bhushan and Additional Solicitor-General Sanjay Jain said the Court should first issue a notice before hearing the Chief Minister. Mr. Bhushan said this was an “open and shut case” of corruption that could result in Mr. Singh's conviction.

The matter led to an impasse in the Himachal Pradesh Assembly earlier this month, with the Opposition demanding a discussion on the money laundering allegations against Mr. Singh. The Speaker rejected the demand with the observation that the matter was sub judice.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.