Excess fee: schools told to deposit 75% in 14 days

HC pulls up schools for delayed action

September 07, 2017 01:43 am | Updated 01:43 am IST - New Delhi

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday directed private schools which have failed to refund the excess fee charged by them despite a government order to deposit 75% of the principal amount within 14 days to avoid coercive action.

A Bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Najmi Waziri directed these city schools to deposit the amount in the form of “cash, fix deposits receipts or bank guarantees favouring the Registrar General” in the High Court Registry.

Court takes exception

The court took strong exception to the fact that over six years had passed since 2011 and the schools had failed on some pretext or the other to comply with the Justice Anil Dev Singh Committee recommendations to refund excess fee.

“We had given you adequate time to put your house in order. Yet, the schools have not complied with our order. They must themselves deposit the amount extracted in excess from students. We acknowledge that there may be variations in the amount calculated by the committee...You deposit the amount and we are inclined to give an expeditious hearing,” the Bench observed.

The court was hearing a bunch of pleas filed by various private schools seeking recall of the Justice Anil Dev Singh Committee recommendations to refund excess fees. They had also challenged a May 29 notice of the Directorate of Education (DoE) ordering refund of excess fees charged by schools, failing which the institutions could face de- recognition or takeover by the Department.

The court directed various schools and the DoE to sit together and articulate the broader issues related to the findings of the panel, which the petitioners were challenging in the case.

The direction came after senior advocates Salman Khurshid and Amit Sibal, appearing for some private schools, said there were discrepancies in the findings of the panel, and challenged some of its recommendations, including computation of excess fee. The Bench posted the matter for hearing on September 25.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.