ED challenges discharge order of Maran brothers

Matter likely to come up in HC soon

May 03, 2017 01:25 am | Updated 01:25 am IST - New Delhi

The Enforcement Directorate on Tuesday moved the Delhi High Court challenging the special court’s order discharging former Telecom Minister Dayanidhi Maran, his industrialist brother Kalanithi Maran and others in the Aircel-Maxis deal case.

As per the lawyers associated with ED, the appeal has been filed against the trial court’s February 2 order and is likely to be listed soon for hearing.

No framing of charges

Special CBI Judge O. P. Saini, while discharging them had said no prima facie case warranting framing of charges against any of the accused was made out on the basis of the materials placed on record before it.

Dealing with the money laundering case, the trial court had observed that since the accused were discharged in the case of scheduled offence registered by the CBI, ED’s matter has become “groundless”.

The accused were also discharged in the case lodged by the CBI against them.

However, the special judge order had no effect on the two accused Malaysian nationals -- Ralph Marshall and T. Ananda Krishnan -- in the CBI’s case as it has already segregated the proceedings against them from that of Maran brothers and others.

Money laundering case

In the money laundering case, ED had chargesheeted the Maran brothers, Kalanithi's wife Kavery, Managing Director of South Asia FM Ltd (SAFL) K Shanmugam, SAFL and Sun Direct TV Pvt Ltd (SDTPL) under provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).

The CBI had filed a charge sheet against the Maran brothers, Ralph Marshall, T Ananda Krishnan and four firms -- M/s Sun Direct TV (P) Ltd, M/s Astro All Asia Networks Plc, UK, M/s Maxis Communications Berhad, Malaysia, M/s South Asia Entertainment Holdings Ltd, Malaysia -- and then Additional Secretary (Telecom) J S Sarma, who had died during the course of the probe.

The special court, in two separate orders, had said the case was based on the foundation that Dayanidhi and Sarma deliberately delayed the approval relating to several issues, including the issuance of UAS licences to Aircel, to force Chennai-based promoter C. Sivasankaran to exit from the telecom sector.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.