Delhi pulled up over job offer to Vemula’s brother

A petition had claimed that the decision was illegal and discriminatory; AAP government asked to file affidavit

May 18, 2016 12:00 am | Updated 08:24 am IST - NEW DELHI

Stoking controversy:Vemula Raja Chaithanya Kumar (right) was offered a group C post.—File Photo

Stoking controversy:Vemula Raja Chaithanya Kumar (right) was offered a group C post.—File Photo

: The Aam Aadmi Party government on Tuesday landed in a fix when the Delhi High Court asked it to file an affidavit on a petition challenging its decision to offer a job on compassionate grounds to the brother of Hyderabad University Dalit scholar Rohith Vemula who had committed suicide in January.

The Delhi government said Vemula Raja Chaithanya Kumar, brother of Mr. Vemula, was not interested in the job offered to him and therefore, the petition became infructuous.

A bench of Chief Justice G. Rohini and Justice Jayanth Nath, however, directed the Delhi government to file an affidavit replying to the petition which claimed that no guidelines were followed while offering the job to Raja.

The court was hearing a petition moved by advocate Avadh Kaushik challenging the February 24 decision passed by the Cabinet to offer a group C post to Raja and government accommodation on out of turn basis.

Against the law

When the AAP government claimed that the job was offered on a representation made by Vemula’s brother, Mr. Kaushik submitted that in response to his RTI application to the Services Department of the Delhi government, he was told that such a representation was not available with the department concerned.

Mr. Kaushik said the decision was “illegal, arbitrary, motivated, discriminatory and unjustifiable and unfair exercise of discretion without any mandate of law, statute, policy and guidelines and in clear violation of law of land and public policy, thereby infringing and abridging the legal and fundamental rights of the public at large in general and Delhi youth in particular who are trying to get jobs on their own merit but deprived by the Delhi government vide its impugned decision”.

He relied on a Supreme Court judgment which says the government is not and should not be as free as an individual in selecting the recipients of its largess.

The petitioner also said that “neither was Vemula a student of Delhi, nor was he a resident of the city. Even otherwise, suicide cannot be held as a good cause to call for giving a job on compassionate grounds to his brother”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.