Custody extended for 1 in document theft case

Lokesh was arrested last week after sensitive documents were recovered

March 01, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 05:37 am IST - NEW DELHI:

NEW DELHI, 23/02/2015: Security personnel keeping vigil outside Shastri Bhawan, in New Delhi on February 23, 2015. 
Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

NEW DELHI, 23/02/2015: Security personnel keeping vigil outside Shastri Bhawan, in New Delhi on February 23, 2015. Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

A Delhi court on Saturday extended the police remand of an accused in the documents theft case for three days.

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Satish Kumar Arora extended the police remand of Lokesh Sharma, an employee of a consultancy firm, when the investigating officer of the case submitted that the names of several private secretaries and assistants of bureaucrats had come to light in the case which required to be probed.

The court had earlier remanded him to five days’ police custody.

The investigating officer also submitted that Lokesh’s further remand was required to confront him with two accused – Jitender Nagpal and Vipan Kumar – arrested in connection with the case on February 25.

Jitender Nagpal was the private secretary to a Joint Secretary in the Forest and Environment Ministry and Vipan Kumar was serving as the private secretary to a Union public Service Commission (UPSC) member. They are in police custody for five days.    

There are two FIRs in the case registered by the Crime Branch of the Delhi Police.

Counsel for the accused opposed the police plea for extension of the police remand of Lokesh. His counsel said that his client had been in custody for five days and the documents had already been recovered.

The police had arrested Lokesh on February 23 alleging that “sensitive” documents pertaining to the Ministries of Coal, Power, Transport and Environment had been recovered from his possession.

So far, 16 persons have been arrested in the two FIRs.

According to the investigating officer of the documents theft case, the extended remand of the accused was needed to confront him with two other accused

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.