Court slams police for lodging stalking case against woman lawyer

Allegedly dragged her out of home for arrest despite order

December 20, 2017 01:34 am | Updated 03:43 pm IST - New Delhi

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday pulled up the city police for lodging a stalking case against a woman lawyer and allegedly dragging her out of her residence to arrest her despite court orders against coercive action.

‘Delinquent officers’

A Bench of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Deepa Sharma directed the Union Home Ministry and the Delhi government to take action against the “delinquent officers” and file a report before the next hearing on January 5.

The Delhi High Court Bar Association also called for a post-lunch strike on Tuesday in protest against the alleged assault on the lawyer by the police.

“How can you [the police] lodge a stalking case against a woman? It cannot be done…We want immediate action,” the Bench said.

It directed the Deputy Commissioner of Police of South District to conduct a fact-finding enquiry into the matter and file a report as the officers involved are from Safdarjung Enclave police station. It ordered the police to provide security to the woman till the next hearing.

Contempt plea

The court order was passed after the lawyer moved a contempt plea, seeking action against the police officers for violating the High Court’s December 18 direction not to take coercive action against her.

According to the lawyers, including senior advocates Kirti Uppal and Vikas Pahwa, appearing for the woman, the case was lodged against her in connection with a property dispute.

Her lawyers claimed that the court had ordered around 4 p.m. on Monday protection to the woman from coercive action, which was communicated to the investigating officer (IO) of the case.

Late communication

The IO, who came to the court after the Bench ordered his presence, defended his actions saying he received late the communication that the non-bailable warrant against the woman had been stayed or set aside.

Stating that he received the information after 5 p.m., the IO said he had arrested her by that time but released her as soon as he came to know about the stay order.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.