Court seeks CBI stand on cover to Verma

Protection sought so he can undergo a polygraph test for statement on Tytler

July 07, 2017 01:45 am | Updated 01:45 am IST - New Delhi

New Delhi: Senior Congress leader Jagdish Tytler coming out  after appearing at Patiala House Court in connection with a defamation case, in New Delhi on Saturday. PTI Photo by Shahbaz Khan(PTI5_31_2014_000070A) *** Local Caption ***

New Delhi: Senior Congress leader Jagdish Tytler coming out after appearing at Patiala House Court in connection with a defamation case, in New Delhi on Saturday. PTI Photo by Shahbaz Khan(PTI5_31_2014_000070A) *** Local Caption ***

A Delhi court on Thursday asked CBI about its stand on a demand by alleged arms dealer Abhishek Verma to provide him with 24-hour security cover so that he can undergo a polygraph test in an anti-Sikh riots case involving senior Congress leader Jagdish Tytler.

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at the Karkardooma courts, Shivali Sharma, said she wanted to know the stand of the investigating officer of the case on this issue, and listed the matter for July 18 as the probe officer was not present at the hearing.

Earlier, Verma informed the court that he was ready to undergo the test if he and his family members were provided round-the-clock security. The CBI has cited Verma as a witness in the case and sought the court’s permission to put him through the lie-detection test, stating that it was needed for the purpose of further investigation.

‘Witness paid ₹1 crore’

Verma had said in a statement recorded by the CBI that Mr. Tytler paid about ₹1 crore to Surinder Singh Granthi, a prosecution witness in the case, and arranged for a visa for $50,000 to send his son, Narinder Singh, another witness in the case, to Canada in return for a statement in his favour.

Verma’s statement is based on what Mr. Tytler allegedly told him during a meeting in 2008. The businessman stated that Mr. Tytler had told him that a deal had been struck with Mr. Surinder Singh, according to which he was to be paid a hefty amount as he (the witness) had given a statement against him.

In its closure report, the CBI said that the evidence offered by Verma indicated that Mr. Tytler might have tried to influence the witness.

However, it could not be verified as the witness, Surinder Singh Granthi, was dead. Also, the statement of the witness was found to be false, concocted and a result of an afterthought in the investigation conducted earlier, the CBI said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.