Court refuses to hear defamation case against CM, Sanjay Singh

Suit filed by Ankit Bhardwaj seeks nominal damages of ₹1

August 25, 2017 01:53 am | Updated 01:53 am IST - New Delhi

‘Derogatory remarks’: The suit claims that Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal (right) and leader Sanjay Singh had defamed the complainant by showing him as sacked Minister Kapil Mishra’s attacker.

‘Derogatory remarks’: The suit claims that Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal (right) and leader Sanjay Singh had defamed the complainant by showing him as sacked Minister Kapil Mishra’s attacker.

A Delhi court has refused to hear a suit filed by Delhi State executive member of the Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha (BJYM) Ankit Bhardwaj against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and senior Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Sanjay Singh seeking nominal damages of ₹1.

Mr. Bhardwaj, in his suit filed at the Tis Hazari district courts, had alleged that the Chief Minister and Mr. Singh had defamed him by claiming that he had slapped sacked Delhi Minister Kapil Mishra who was sitting on a dharna on May 10.

Jurisdiction issue

Mr. Bhardwaj alleged that they had defamed him by making derogatory remarks against him in their tweets and by showing him as the person who had attacked Mr. Mishra.

Returning the complaint to Mr. Bhardwaj, Additional Senior Civil Judge V. K. Gautam said: “The present court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit. Since the court has no jurisdiction to entertain the present suit, the plaint is returned back to the plaintiff. The plaint is returned to the plaintiff after putting necessary endorsements for its presentation to the proper court.”

Sanjay Singh’s address

The court also said that Mr. Singh did not reside in the area within the jurisdiction of the court.

The plaintiff had given the address of the Aam Aadmi Party office at 206, Rouse Avenue, on Deen Dayal Upadhyay Marg near ITO as Mr. Singh’s address.

Cause of action

Further, the court said the perusal of the plaint showed there was no averment as to why any cause of action had occurred within the jurisdiction of this court.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.