Court asks Payal Abdullah to vacate government bungalow

It was allotted to former J&K CM Omar Abdullah in 1999 when he was an MP

August 17, 2016 12:00 am | Updated 08:18 am IST - New Delhi:

Plea:Payal Abdullah has filed a plea in the Delhi High Court seeking a direction to allow her and her two sons to stay im the bungalow, or allot a suitable government accommodation where the family’s 94 security personnel can effectively protect them.— File Photo: Shanker Chakravarty

Plea:Payal Abdullah has filed a plea in the Delhi High Court seeking a direction to allow her and her two sons to stay im the bungalow, or allot a suitable government accommodation where the family’s 94 security personnel can effectively protect them.— File Photo: Shanker Chakravarty

A court here on Tuesday upheld an order by the Estate Officer directing Payal Abdullah, the estranged wife of former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, to vacate 7, Akbar Road government accommodation in Lutyens’ Delhi.

The accommodation was allotted to Mr. Abdullah in 1999 when he was an MP.

District and Sessions Judge Amar Nath dismissed her appeal to quash the vacation notice issued on June 30 by the Estate Officer of the J-K government under the J-K Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act.

In her appeal against the vacation order, Ms. Abdullah submitted that her family continued to live in the bungalow when Mr. Omar was neither Chief Minister of the State nor a Minister at the Centre.

She said that the notice issued by the Estate Officer of J-K was illegal as it was issued under a State law, which is not applicable in Delhi.

Ms. Abdullah also said that the vacation notice was not sent by the Union Ministry of Urban Development, which had allotted the accommodation.

Ms. Abdullah has also filed a petition in the Delhi High Court seeking a direction to allow her and her two sons to stay in the bungalow, or allot a suitable government accommodation where the family’s 94 security personnel could effectively protect them.

The matter is still pending there. It is scheduled to come up for hearing on August 19.

Ms. Abdullah, in her petition in the High Court, said she was served with the vacation notice by the Estate Officer in June, and when Mr. Omar was communicated about it, he replied that they were free to take whatever action they deemed fit as he was no longer living there.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.