Acid attack victims move High Court for enhanced compensation

January 18, 2017 12:36 am | Updated 12:36 am IST - NEW DELHI:

Two sisters, both victims of an acid attack, have moved the Delhi High Court with a plea that the compensation awarded to such victims be enhanced from the ₹3 lakh at present, even as the revised Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme awaits approval.

Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva issued notice to the Delhi government, the Delhi State Legal Services Authority (DSLSA), the Ministry of Women and Child Development and the Ministry of Home Affairs seeking their reply before February 14 on the plea of the two sisters who were attacked by a jilted lover in 2009.

The women, who were rendered visually impaired as a result of the attack, have sought enhancement of the ₹3 lakh compensation awarded to them by DSLSA in 2016. They have also sought removal of the cap on compensation awarded under the Delhi Victims Compensation Scheme.

Clearing medical bills

They have also sought directions to the government to reimburse the ₹15 lakh they have spent on their medical bills. A bunch of similar petitions are pending before the same Bench where the victims have sought enhanced compensation.

In many cases, the victims are still paying for their medical bills to be cleared by the government.

“The petitioners, who are victims of acid attacks, are seeking intervention of this court for a direction to the respondent (the Delhi government) herein, inter alia, for payment of enhanced compensation, exceeding the amount of Rs.3 lakh, and direction to the respondent (the Delhi government) to provide treatment to the victims free of cost,” their petition said.

Horrific attack

The sisters used to run a beauty parlour. The attacker had proposed marriage to one of them.

When snubbed, he threw acid on them on October 14, 2009. Both sisters received 15 to 20 per cent acid burns on their faces including eyes, arms, shoulders, chest and abdomen. The accused was apprehended only to be acquitted by a trail court after prosecution failed to prove its case against him.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.