Papers of BJP’s Nilgiris nominee rejected

In Chidambaram, the nomination of PMK candidate K.I. Manirathinem was rejected as it did not carry the mandatory proposals from 10 persons.

April 07, 2014 04:30 pm | Updated May 21, 2016 09:18 am IST - Udhagamandalam

In a major jolt, the BJP in Tamil Nadu is set to contest one seat less in the Lok Sabha elections than the eight allotted to it in the alliance, as the nomination of its candidate for the Nilgiris was rejected on Monday.

Chief Electoral Officer Praveen Kumar told The Hindu in Chennai that once a nomination was rejected there was no provision for appeal in the election laws. The aggrieved party could approach court with an election petition, but only after elections were completed.

Election officials in Chennai said S. Gurumurthy, the BJP’s candidate for the Nilgiris (reserved for the SC), failed to attach Forms A and B to his papers on time on April 3, 2014. The documents were mandatory as they carried the authorisation from the party of the candidate.

The papers of the alternative candidate, D. Anbarasan, also suffered the same flaw. Mr. Gurumurthy explored the option of contesting as an Independent, but the attempt failed.

In Chidambaram (SC), the nomination of PMK candidate K.I. Manirathinem was rejected as it did not carry the mandatory proposals from 10 persons.

Officials said that as the PMK was not a recognised State party, the 10 proposals were mandatory. However, the nomination of his wife, Sudha Manirathinem, the ‘dummy’ candidate for the party, was accepted.

The nomination of Aam Aadmi Party candidate for Thanjavur Pazhanirajan was rejected on the ground that some of the proposers were from outside the constituency.

Flutter in Sivaganga

S.K. Srivastava, a New Delhi-based IT official, alleged in a petition to the Returning Officer in Sivaganga that Congress candidate Karti Chidambaram had filed a false affidavit in respect of his assets. But at the end of scrutiny, the Returning Officer, V. Rajaraman, found Mr. Karti’s nomination valid and accepted it. However, speaking to journalists, Union Finance Minister and his father P. Chidambaram rejected the charge that Mr. Karti had given false information about his assets in the affidavit.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.