News Update Service
Saturday, August 23, 2008 : 0315 Hrs      
RSS Feeds


Sections
  • Top Stories
  • National
  • International
  • Regional
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Sci. & Tech.
  • Entertainment
  • Agri. & Commodities
  • Beijing Olympics 2008

  • Index

  • Photo Gallery

    The Hindu
    Print Edition

  • Front Page
  • National
  • Tamil Nadu
  • Andhra Pradesh
  • Karnataka
  • Kerala
  • Delhi
  • Other States
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Miscellaneous
  • Index

  • Magazine
  • Literary Review
  • Metro Plus
  • Business
  • Education Plus
  • Open Page
  • Book Review
  • SciTech
  • NXg
  • Entertainment
  • Cinema Plus
  • Young World
  • Property Plus
  • Quest

  • National
    Phone-tapping case: HC seeks report from Special Cell

    New Delhi (PTI): The Delhi High Court on Friday sought a detailed report from the Special Cell, city police's anti-terrorist unit, over a Metropolitan Magistrate's allegation that his mobile phone calls have been illegally tapped by police.

    The court also sought details related to the magistrate's telephone from Airtel, the cellular service provider.

    Justice G S Sistani issued notice to police and directed them to place before it by September 24 a report giving details of calls that were tapped from the judge's mobile phone.

    In a letter written to the Chief Justice in May this year, a Magistrate from Tis Hazari court alleged that Inspector Rajender Singh Pathania, posted in the Special Cell, had illegally recorded his mobile phone conversations.

    Seeking action against the police officer, the judge claimed that he had confirmed from the mobile phone service provider, Airtel, that the Special Cell had kept his phone under observation for monitoring his calls.

    The magistrate alleged Pathania was harassing him due to ulterior motives, the complainant judge said.

    Explaining an earlier instance, the Magistrate said that when Pathania was the SHO of Samaipur Badli he had falsely implicated his (judge's) cousin and his friend in a criminal case last February.

    However, on a petition by victims, the FIR in the case was quashed by the High Court which also reprimanded the Inspector for his "conduct," causing harassment of public.

    The High Court had also ordered for a CBI enquiry against the inspector besides imposing a fine of Rs 25,000 on him and his other colleagues, the judge wrote in the letter.

    Perturbed by the court's order, the cop became revengeful and started troubling me, the magistrate alleged.


    National






    Sections: Top Stories | National | International | Regional | Business | Sport | Sci. & Tech. | Entertainment | Agri. & Commodities | Beijing Olympics 2008 | Index
    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Business Line News Update | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home

    Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu