Hype but no hope

A look at actors being cast to create hype, but not being offered solid roles

June 07, 2016 08:55 pm | Updated September 16, 2016 11:22 am IST

A still from Brahmotsavam

A still from Brahmotsavam

An unexpected casting for a role is an exciting prospect. It could give you a better reason to catch the film in the theatres, especially if the actor in question is coming back after a sabbatical or attempting something against their normal image. However if this is not done well, audience tend to complain that injustice has been done to their body of work.

Take the case of Brahmotsavam that was billed as a multi-starrer. Revathi, Thulasi, Jayasudha, Saranya, Rao Ramesh, all actors who have the potential to save a sinking ship were in it. Yet, except for Rao Ramesh, none got parts where they could invest in their experience. Revathi (her recent films being Anukshanam and Loafer ) and Saranya (only her second direct Telugu film after KomaramPuli ), known to be choosy, had roles that weren’t substantial enough to make an impact.

Srimanthudu was similar. Sukanya, Sithara and Thulasi were reduced to static objects in the background for most parts of the film. The reasons for actors to choose similar projects have been a mix of the value of the director, the banner, the remuneration besides the assurance that they would be adding value to the narration. Sowcar Janaki was a breath of fresh air in both Kanche and Yevade Subramanyam , but was wasted in Soukhyam for instance.

Others in this list include Tisca Chopra (of Taare Zameen Par fame), who forayed into Telugu films, playing mother in Srinu Vaitla’s Bruce Lee . A major portion in the film had her being slapped by Brahmanandam in what was passed off as ‘comic relief’. Sardaar Gabbar Singh too didn’t do much to add to her repertoire.

Yesteryear heroine Radhika, who came back to Telugu films after a 13 year gap with a rather small Undile Manchi Kalam Mundumunduna in 2014, claimed, prior to the release, that she was bowled by the first-time director Arun Dasyam’s enthusiasm. And did the film or the actor’s role meet expectations? Not quite. So was the case with Srivariki Premalekha fame Poornima, whose presence as a melodramatic mother in Andhra Pori too failed to register a chord with audiences. Only a handful of comebacks, say from the likes of Raasi, who managed to bag a decent role in Kalyana Vaibhogame and Nadhiya, who’s being stereotyped in the authoritarian-mom roles, have managed to prove otherwise.

It’s high time storytellers don’t rely on names in films to sell a story.

The hype surrounding the names may bring crowds to theatres, but it’s the character’s solidity that needs to back it up.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.