Features » Sunday Magazine

Updated: April 2, 2011 16:59 IST

When two is too much

Comment (5)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Taking a stand: Yang Zhizhu. Photo: Ananth Krishnan
Taking a stand: Yang Zhizhu. Photo: Ananth Krishnan

In China, tens of thousands of people face fines and lose their jobs every year for breaking family planning rules. This Beijing couple, chose to have a second child and challenge the “One-Child Policy”….

On a summer's evening in 2009, Yang Zhizhu's wife broke the news to him. She spoke softly, in hushed tones that barely disturbed the heavy silence that filled their small Beijing home. The occasion, she felt, demanded secrecy. She was pregnant, she told her husband, speaking hesitantly and quietly, unsure of how he would respond. His first reaction, Yang instantly recalls, was instinctual – he was delighted, just like any father-in-waiting would be. But then, as he slowly processed the news, emotion gave way to the coldness of the new reality he faced: Yang knew his family would soon have a painful decision to make.

Yang's emotional seesaw is one that thousands of young parents across China go through every year. It has, in fact, become a part of life in this country over the past three decades, during which tightly-enforced family planning laws have routinely presented families, like Yang's, with unimaginably difficult choices. In China, having a second child incurs a heavy fine, one that few families can afford. It could also mean losing your job, if you work for the government; or, in some extreme cases, increasingly rare but still prevalent, even having your child forcibly aborted.

Without a job

Yang, 44, teaches Constitutional Law at the China Youth University for Political Sciences. It has, however, been almost half a year since he gave his last lecture: he was suspended from his teaching position last April, four months after he became a father for the second time. Yang's second daughter was born on December 21, 2009. But even before then, he had already been given three stern warnings from his university, and summoned to meetings with the local family planning bureau after they had learned of his wife's pregnancy. At his third meeting with the authorities, a few weeks before his daughter was born, officials from the household registration department gave him one last chance. They placed before him a statement declaring that his wife would have the baby aborted, asking him to sign it. He refused. “God gave us a child,” Yang tells me, explaining his decision, when we meet in his Beijing home, which sits in a leafy community in the city's northwestern university district. “My wife and I had never planned for our second daughter. But when she was given to us, we asked ourselves, who are we to question God's will?” Having her, they knew, would mean an uncertain future – facing heavy penalties, even losing their jobs. “We still decided we couldn't lose her,” Yang says. “She was already two months old, living, breathing and alive. How could I do something like that to my own daughter?”

Divided opinion

China's family planning rules, the government estimates, have prevented an additional 300 million births since they came into force in 1979. The rules are commonly known as the “One-Child Policy”, although, in effect, they are a far more complicated set of measures. In rural areas, for instance, families can have two children if their first-born is a girl, while in cities, couples who are both only children can have a second child. Critics of the policy, however, are far from convinced about its merits: they say the jury is still out, pointing to a fast-widening gender imbalance three decades on, and increasing fears about a rapidly aging society and shrinking workforce. The 1980s and 1990s have also seen innumerable violations of people's rights on the policy's account, from forced abortions to mass sterilisation campaigns. These are rarer now, but still do take place; a prominent blot on China's recent attempts to build the rule of law. (Only a few months ago, the case of a woman in Xiamen, a city in Fujian province, who had her eight-month-old foetus forcibly aborted by local officials, whose careers are often judged on meeting family planning targets, caused outrage among Chinese rights activists.)

It was against this backdrop of increasing debate that Yang Zhizhu decided to take a stand. A few months into his wife's pregnancy, Yang was called in to a meeting with the university's Communist Party representative and its family planning bureau – every institution and State-run company has a family planning department that counsels, reports on and penalises employees. The bureau had been informed by one of his neighbours that his wife had become pregnant for the second time; every community has a “tip-off box” that encourages residents to report on any possible family planning violators. (Yang makes it a point to show me the box. Another undesirable legacy of the policy, he says wryly: “a community where everyone watches each other.”) After losing his job, Yang was made to pay 240,000 yuan (around $37,000) for his second daughter's household registration certificate; without this, she can neither attend school, nor, for that matter, get a marriage license. Families are fined anywhere between three and 10 times the average income in their city. Yang's fine was nine times the average income in Beijing, which is 26,000 yuan. “They knew I cannot afford to pay it,” he said. “They wanted to make an example.” Yang, with nothing to lose, decided to take a stand; he refused to pay the fine, and took the government to court, saying the policy, and the fine, was a violation of rights guaranteed under the constitution.

Stirring debate

Yang's case, which began in February in a local court in Beijing, has stirred debate. His story has also received wide media coverage in China. Yang doesn't expect his case to go very far. “What I want to do is to get more people to question this policy, as well as their fundamental rights,” he said.

China's “One-child policy”, since its introduction 30 years ago, has been a demographic experiment never before seen in history. Scholars say it is far too early to judge its outcome. Even if it spared China a tremendous burden, it has now been seen as leading to a gender imbalance as well as a shrinking workforce. Its critics are growing. In March, ahead of the annual session of the Chinese National People's Congress, Ji Baocheng, a delegate who is also the Dean of Beijing's Renmin University, said he would put forward a proposal to ease the rules, and for China to move towards a “two-child policy.” Rumours of rules being eased have intensified over the past couple of years, although there has been no real change in policy. This year, too, Ji's proposal seemed to sink without a trace. The government has also moved to clamp down on the debate; this month, the party's propaganda department issued a directive to all media to immediately refrain from discussing changes to the policy. Yang's case, too, has been deemed off limits.

“More and more, it's becoming clear that this policy has done more harm than good,” Yang tells me. “What the government doesn't tell us is that even without the policy, the birth rate would have naturally declined. This has been the case in all industrialising societies. Look at Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore. Even after they eased the policy in some countries, people are choosing to have fewer children. So why force them?” Yang, and his family, face an uncertain future. He is still without a job, with two children at home. He has overdue fines and worries about how, a year from now, his daughter can find a school. Does he have any regrets? “None at all,” he says, with a smile. “If this policy is scrapped by the time by daughter grows up, I will feel like I have made some contribution.” He looks to his wife who sits quietly by his side, with their young daughter safely in her hands.

Nature has a way of taking care of itself. So when there is an imbalance created through over population, some correction will happen.
Poor are not becoming poorer because of lack of resources. It is the rich getting richer which creates the major imbalance in demand for resources and the ensuing imbalance. And growing population does not make the rich, richer.
Having said this, any government will only look for its survival. The policies it creates are based on this survival instinct and control is a key factor in this. In India, the stabilization in population growth is starting to happen despite the government's failure in this area. It is the educated that have limited their families and brought about the change, but the fact that it still keeps growing (albeit slower than before) is the vote bank politics adopted to keep numbers in control in rural areas.What would have happened in China and the world if there was no such policy in that country, is anyone's guess. Additional 300 million people in one country cannot possibly be good for that country or for the world at large. It has been rightly mentioned that there is decline in population in some of the countries. This is a natural cycle. Just imagine what would happen if all the countries in the world had seemingly continuous population growth.
It is easy for us to comment sitting far away in a A/C room and type our thoughts online. Facing reality without such control and living in China could be a very different prospect, which we may not be willing to face. So let us not be judgmental and look at our own problems first.

from:  Suresh A
Posted on: Apr 6, 2011 at 11:34 IST

Surprised that this is in the 'Arts/Magazine' section of the site! This is more human right violation than any 'Art'.
Also, surprised that a person can take the Chinese Government to court.

from:  Karthick
Posted on: Apr 6, 2011 at 07:42 IST

Government of any country should not try to control the act of nature. Newton’s law indicates an opposite reaction, the time line is not defined, but definitely a negative approach will yield a negative equal and opposite reaction.
Governors: Do not control your people by force, build their togetherness with love. Nature will bless your country.

from:  Sriram Umasankar
Posted on: Apr 4, 2011 at 12:16 IST

Earth is a planet of plenty but not without limitations. One of the reasons for the poor to become poorer and rich becoming richer is the growing population that place a pressure on the resources, environment and governments. The easiest solution to the problem would be a two child policy, if efficiently implemented would help to maintain the current population ratio. But time for that has already passed. Hence, when I agree and desist the mental turmoil the parents will face due to the Chinese One-Child policy, it has its merits. When the population in China reduces to an amount to implement 'Two Child Policy', the population could be stabilized. However, it shouldn't be taken as my support to the means of enforcement of the policy. In Western countries, the population is balanced not by strict laws but by education, economic constraints and responsible attitude of the parents to their children. In France, for example, many have their first child at the around their 30s. Comparing it with India, where marriage is expected as soon as the son starts earning and a child is expected in the first year of their marriage places India in a unique situation. Hence, if One-Child policy is to be realised in India, it should more of an encouragement strategy than of the punitive strategy followed in China.

from:  Sivasathivel Kandasamy
Posted on: Apr 2, 2011 at 21:50 IST

Good article on a serious human right violation. All these gender imbalances etc. are just a side effect of serious crime perpetrated by the government. Fetal killing should not be taken lightly and I only hope that India will never ever follow such inhuman policies. Family planning should result from an individual's self control, and not government enforcement.

from:  Jayanth
Posted on: Apr 2, 2011 at 18:48 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Amandeep Sandhu, Manjul Bajaj, Manu Joseph and Sonora Jha read from their novels that were shortlisted for The Hindu Prize for Fiction 2013. Ziya Us Salam introduces them and moderates the session. <... »



Recent Article in Sunday Magazine

A still from 'Mary Kom'.

Whose life is it anyway?

Given the excitement around Mary Kom, one wonders about the liberties taken in biopics. »