Gentle was her voice

Nisha Rajagopal could bring out the meditative aspect of the kritis.

January 03, 2013 06:40 pm | Updated June 10, 2016 01:47 pm IST

Chennai:16/12/12: Nisha Rajagopalan performing vocal concert at The Music Academy, 86th Annual Conference and Concerts on Sunday. Photo: R_Shivaji Rao

Chennai:16/12/12: Nisha Rajagopalan performing vocal concert at The Music Academy, 86th Annual Conference and Concerts on Sunday. Photo: R_Shivaji Rao

Nisha Rajagopal’s concert blossomed with ‘Sasivadhana’ (Chandrajothi, Tyagaraja) that came at a gentle pace and possibly indicated what was in store. She followed it with ‘Nadha Sudharasam,’ the Arabhi kriti of Tyagaraja.

These two numbers could be contrasted with ‘Naama Kusuma’ (Sri Ragam, Dikshitar) which has a swagger, almost, in its rendering pace. Nisha could create the meditative atmosphere that is associated with this genre of songs.

Another Dikshitar kriti that captured one’s attention for its bhava was ‘Hiranmayim Lakshmim’ (Lalitha). The context of this song and Dikshitar’s encounter with ‘this worldly’ wealth and scant respect for it, is too well known to be documented here. This song had fine finishes at all closing points and laid stress on the sahitya and its stately provenance.

Nisha’s strength probably lies in the rendering of akara sangatis that was well deployed in her raga alapanas - for Khambodi (‘Evari Mata Vina’, Tyagaraja) and for Shanmukhapriya, which had an RTP. This strength was always used with considerable restraint; never overdone. There was an elaborate neraval at ‘Bhaktha Paraadhinudanuchu’ for the Khambodi song.

Every now and then, Nisha imparts a nasal slant to her voice that tends to rob partly the beauteous element in her singing.

If this has come to her quite naturally, (maestros who held their sway over audiences in spite of their nasally inclined voices is legion) she and we, the rasikas, have to learn to accept it as part of Nisha’s style. The question is: Is some corrective measure needed/possible? She would be the best judge.

Later ‘Bogeendra Sayeenam’ (Swati Tirunal, Kuntalavarali) came with a smooth transition at the charanam with the laya vidwans welcoming and preparing themselves adequately.

VVS Murari, the violinist, matched the singer in every area. His alapanas and swara swells bore the stamp of originality. His Khambodi alapana was built into an edifice brick by brick. All his crescendos were lively and yet smooth in their executions.

Trivandrum Balaji (mridangam) and Trikkakara Shantharam (ganjira) had many things to offer. They added immense value to the concert by sticking to an accompanying style that always sought to lay due focus on the songs. This became particularly noticeable during the rendering of the Sriragam and Lalitha kritis. Their thani was powered by a combination of caressing strokes and complex kanakku phrases that enlivened the proceedings.

(sivakumar2004 @gmail.com)

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.