Ramanujan’s genius finally proven by scientist

November 09, 2012 05:31 pm | Updated 05:31 pm IST - London

Hence proved! A US scientist has finally proven the mathematical relation — discussed by great Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan with his mentor G.H. Hardy in one of his last letters.

Mr. Ramanujan, the young genius who died at the age of 32, often managed to leap from insight to insight without formally proving the logical steps in between.

Now proof has been found for a connection that he seemed to mysteriously intuit between two types of mathematical functions, the New Scientist reported.

“His ideas as to what constituted a mathematical proof were of the most shadowy description,” G.H. Hardy, Mr. Ramanujan’s mentor and one of his few collaborators, had once said.

Ken Ono of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, who has previously unearthed hidden depths in Mr. Ramanujan’s work, was prompted by Mr. Ramanujan’s 125th birth anniversary, to look once more at his writings.

“I wanted to go back and prove something special,” Mr. Ono said.

Ono settled on a discussion in the last known letter that Mr. Ramanujan wrote to Mr. Hardy, concerning a type of function now called a modular form.

Functions are equations that can be drawn as graphs on an axis, like a sine wave, and produce an output when computed for any chosen input or value

The functions looked unlike any other modular forms, but Mr. Ramanujan wrote that their outputs would be very similar to those of modular forms when computed for the roots of 1 like the square root —1.

Characteristically, Mr. Ramanujan offered neither proof nor explanation for this conclusion.

It was only 10 years later that mathematicians formally defined this other set of functions, now known as mock modular forms.

However, still no one fathomed what Mr. Ramanujan meant by saying the two types of function produced similar outputs for roots of 1.

Now Mr. Ono and colleagues have exactly calculated one of Mr. Ramanujan’s mock modular forms for values very close to —1, and said the difference in the value of the two functions, ignoring the functions signs, is tiny when computed for —1, just like Mr. Ramanujan said.

The result confirms Mr. Ramanujan’s incredible intuition, said Mr. Ono.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.