Call of the Titans

Chitravina Ravikiran’s brilliance was well-matched by M. Chandrasekaran’s expertise.

December 22, 2016 04:15 pm | Updated 07:40 pm IST

 Chitravina N. Ravikiran. Photo: M. Karunakaran

Chitravina N. Ravikiran. Photo: M. Karunakaran

If Chitravina Ravikiran’s concert at the Music Academy was a grand success, major credit should go to the rapport between the main artist and the principal accompanist, M. Chandrasekaran. While the veteran violinist expressed his appreciation of Ravikiran’s playing with incessant sabash and bale bale, the chitravina expert on his part, dedicated ‘Chandrasekara Pahimam’ to the violinist.

Though the central piece of the concert was Ritigowla, the most interesting composition was in Kannada Maruva, a rare raga, which was given an elaborate treatment. A derivative of Kalyani, this raga closely resembles the mother raga from panchamam upwards, but below the ‘pa’, it is practically Amrutavarshini. Kannada Maruva therefore is half Amrutavarshini and half Kalyani, both on the ascent and the descent. It sounds beautiful. After a detailed alapana, Ravikiran took up Oothukadu Venkatasubbaiyar’s Sanskrit composition, ‘Vande Nanda Soonum’, which is perhaps the only available composition in the raga. Chandrasekaran, who said that he had not heard the raga before, played impeccably. The genius of both the artists came through in this piece.

The Ritigowla alapana was marked by long, slow phrases, perhaps underscoring the advantage of the fretless chitravina. Here, Chandrasekaran’s raga essay was markedly different from Ravikiran’s, the violin featuring one long, pause-less phrase.

Subbaraya Sastri’s ‘Janani Ninnuvina’ that appeared in due course was well-cued by the alapana. When it came to the kalpanaswaras, Ravikiran chose to append the notes to the last line of the chittaiswaram – sa ni da pa ma ga ri sa – rather than a word in the song. The effect was good.

Simhendra Madhyamam came as the first part of the RTP. In the tanam, Ravikiran chose to break into a ragamalika. He switched to Nilambari but requested the violinist to play another raga of his choice. Chandrasekaran chose Dhanyasi, following which Ravikiran presented a Kedaragowla. After a word of praise for the Kedaragowla, Chandrasekaran said he would like to play the same raga and brought forth a delectable tanam.

The pallavi was the only disappointment of the concert.

When an artist begins an RTP, he raises expectations of elaborate niravals, tala exercises and multi-raga swaras. The tala exercises or multi-raga swaras were part of the tanam while niraval was hardly noticeable.

If shortage of time was the reason, Ravikiran could have presented a composition instead.

Patri Satishkumar, who has apparently modelled his style after vidwan Umayalpuram Sivaram, played superbly, as did Bangalore Amrit (ganjira).

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.