“RIL cannot supply gas at a price lower than that fixed by government”

October 22, 2009 12:47 am | Updated November 17, 2021 06:44 am IST - New Delhi

Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL) could not go along with the memorandum of understanding on supply of gas to Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. (RNRL) at a price that was far lower than that fixed by the government under its National Gas Utilisation Policy, senior counsel Harish Salve argued in the Supreme Court on Wednesday. By breaching the Production Sharing Contract (PSC) with the government and by supplying gas at a lower price to RNRL he (RIL) would run the risk of cancellation of the PSC.

Mr. Salve made this submission before a Bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan and Justices R.V. Raveendran and P. Sathasivam, hearing the dispute between RIL and RNRL over gas supply.

Different from farming

When Mr. Justice Raveendran told Mr. Salve that he sounded as if RIL was purchasing the gas from the government, counsel said the PSC for gas exploration was different from farming activities where farmers owned land and the crop they harvested. Even after the PSC, the gas remained a national asset and over a period 85 per cent of the profit went to government coffers and 15 per cent to the exploring and refining companies.

At this, Mr. Justice Raveendran wanted to know whether RIL or RNRL ever challenged the National Gas Utilisation Policy. Mr. Salve said none questioned it.

When the judge asked whether RIL would make a profit from selling gas at a price it committed itself to NTPC, although it was substantially lower than the government-approved price, Mr. Salve did not give a categorical reply. He, however, said: “If RNRL is asking me [RIL] to give gas at a lower price, then the government will be debiting my account and I am recovering a lesser amount. I have no control on gas, price and choice of customers.”

Not maintainable

He argued that RNRL’s suit against the demerger in the Bombay High Court was not maintainable as it was a third party and neither RIL’s shareholder nor creditor at the time of its filing. Arguments will continue on Thursday.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.