In a fresh crackdown against ‘collective investment schemes’, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has asked Alchemist Infra Realty Ltd. to wind up all such activities and refund the money collected from public investors, which could be more than Rs.1,000 crore, within three months.

Co., directors barred

Besides, the company and its five directors have also been barred from the securities market till the time all its schemes are wound up and the money is refunded to investors.

In its order dated June 21, SEBI has also warned the company and its directors of initiating prosecution proceedings and a criminal case for “offences of fraud, cheating, criminal breach of trust and misappropriation of public funds” if its orders are not complied with.

SEBI probe also found that the investment application forms of the company also mentioned that it was part of ‘Alchemist Group’, which was engaged in diverse activities such as steel, food and beverages, IT, healthcare, media, aviation, realty, hospitality, education and tea estate, among others, with asset base of over Rs.5,000 crore.

“Thus, an investor/applicant is misled to believe that the company, Alchemist Infra Realty Ltd, is part of the Alchemist Group, whereas the company has contended (before SEBI) that it is not associated with the Alchemist Group,” the SEBI order said.

Investigation

The said ‘Alchemist Group’ is headed by industrialist K. D. Singh, at present a Rajya Sabha MP of Trinamool Congress from Jharkhand.

SEBI began its investigations into the affairs of the company in 2011 after receipt of an anonymous complaint about Alchemist Infra Realty mobilising money from the public investors in breach of regulations.

The regulator later found that the company was running ‘collective investment schemes’ in the name of real estate business and had garnered Rs.1,087 crore as on March 31, 2011. The company was charging up to 75 per cent as ‘development charges’ from the money collected from investors towards purchase of land.

Meanwhile, the company sought to settle the case through SEBI’s consent mechanism, but the plea was rejected by the regulator.