Iran's two major oil buyer — India and China — now appear to be seeking to take advantage of the international sanctions against the Islamic republic by forcing concessions from Tehran, a latest Congressional report has claimed.
“India has used the payments difficulties to force concessions from Iran, including an Iranian acceptance of payment for about 45 per cent of the oil sales in rupees, India's local currency, but which is not convertible,” the Congressional Research Service (CRS) said.
“The remainder might be settled through barter trade or Indian investment in Iran, and some might be settled in gold. The Iranian concessions have made it attractive for India to refuse U.S. efforts to persuade it to cut its oil purchases from the baseline level of about 350,000 barrels a day,” it said.
As the name suggests, CRS is the independent bi-partisan research wing of the U.S. Congress, comprising experts of various fields.
CRS prepares reports on different issues for the information of U.S. lawmakers.
“Like India, China appears to be seeking to take advantage of the sanctions for its own purposes, and in so doing signalling to Iran that it disapproves of its behaviour,” said the nearly 80-page report titled Iran Sanctions.
“China has said it will not significantly reduce its oil purchases from their 2011 average level of about 550,000 barrels a day, despite the threat of the U.S. sanctions. Oil industry observers say that China cut its oil buys from Iran by about 50 per cent for January, 2012, apparently in an attempt to force Iran to discount the oil it sells to China,” it said.
“The reduction could have been caused by a disagreement between Iran and Unipec, one of China's top importers — a disagreement reportedly resolved in mid-February, 2012, and which is likely to cause China's imports from Iran to return to baseline levels. Some reports in late March, 2012, suggested another Chinese refiner, Sinopec, might cut its purchases from Iran,” it said.
CRS said South Korea is known to be actively negotiating with the United States to achieve an exemption.
“The three other large Iranian oil buyers — China, India, and Turkey — have not pledged to cut oil purchases from Iran. In addition, trade that is conducted in cash or barter arrangements would not risk sanctions under the provision,” it said.
“With the payments mechanisms largely closed or closing, India's position on whether it will cooperate with a broader oil embargo on Iran remains in doubt as of late March, 2012,” the report said, adding that India's record of cooperation with multilateral sanctions against Iran was mixed.
“India has generally been considered friendly toward Iran, and many experts were surprised when India's central bank, in late December 2010, announced that it would no longer use a regional body, the Asian Clearing Union, to handle transactions with Iran,” the reports said.
“The Asian Clearing Union, based in Tehran, was set up in the 1970s by the United Nations to ease commerce among Asian nations. There have been allegations in recent years that Iran might be using the Clearing Union to handle transactions so as to avoid limitations imposed by European and other banks, and India's move followed President (Barack) Obama's visit there in November, 2010,” it said.
“With India's purchases of about 350,000 barrels a day of Iranian oil (about $11-billion worth of oil in 2011) made difficult by the move, in February, 2011, India and Iran agreed to use an Iranian bank, Europaisch-Iranische Handelsbank (EIH) to clear the payments,” it said.
On May 23, 2011, the EU named EIH and about 100 other entities as Iran proliferation-related activities, rendering India and Iran again in search of an alternative payments mechanism.
With about $6.3 billion in oil payments due Iran building up in an escrow account, in July, 2011, Tehran threatened to reduce or cut off entirely oil shipments to India.
In late July, 2011, the two identified Turkey's Halkbank as an acceptable processor and on September 4, 2011, Iran's Central Bank Governor said India had fully settled its debt.
The U.S. law sanctioning dealings with Iran's Central Bank led Halkbank in January, 2012, to express the view that it might not be able to continue handling payments to Iran, the report said.
According to CRS, Iran's oil sales for March have fallen dramatically from prior levels.
“Once the EU embargo is fully implemented, Iran's oil sales might fall by as much as 40 per cent (one million barrels a day reduction out of 2.5 million barrels a day of sales). Iran is widely assessed as unable to economically sustain that level of lost oil sales,” it said. The signs of economic pressure on Iran are multiplying, it said, adding that the value of Iran's rial had dropped precipitously since December, 2011.
Iranian leaders had admitted that Iran was virtually cut off from the international banking system and was increasingly trading through barter arrangements rather than hard currency exchange, it said.
“The pullout from Iran by major international firms has slowed Iran's efforts to modernise its energy sector and other sectors, rendering Iran unable to increase its oil production above 4.1 million barrels a day. Still, Iran has small amounts of natural gas exports; it had none at all before Iran opened its fields to foreign investment in 1996. Still, relatively high world oil prices have reduced some of the effects of the sanctions,” CRS added.
Keywords: India oil purchase, Iran sanctions, oil sales








The title of this article should be China,South Korea cashing in on Iran sanctions. South Korea has a special arrangement with the US and is always exempt from following sanctions imposed on any country whether it is Myamar or in the past Libya,Iraq,Sudan. China does what it wants but India is the lameduck which is always losing out. As the article mentions India is importing USD 11 billion worth of oil from Iran each year, but how much is Indian exports to Iran. The figure is not more than one to one and half billion dollars resulting in a deficit of around USD 10 billions This situation is going on for the last 32 years. China, South Korea,Japan are exporting to Iran more then what they are importing. All this hype of India taking advantage is just political showtalk and nothing else. India should replace Iran's oil with oil from countries which buy Indian goods and allow Indian experts to work in their countries. Iran does not do either of these like UAE,Kuwait,Iraq,SArabia,etc
Trying to put a spin are we now?
India and Iran have to have good relations and India knows that. For the simple reason that India and Iran not only share historical links but also the fact that India has the largest shia muslim population after Iran. This report is trying to spin the actions of India and China as a move to support the sanction but on the contrary this is pure practical business.
The West has other primary sources of oil. Iran was never a major player in their calculations. So, what does it matter to the US to put sanctions?!? But it does matter to India and China, who are major importers of oil from Iran. Why should they sacrifice their growth and a historical friendship at the behest of a fickle West?
Sir, This is a very mischievous report. The reasons India is paying in Rupees(which are freely convertible - unlike what the article claims)and barter are that because of the sanctions, she has not been able to pay Iran in the usual currency - the US Dollar, as the bank routes for making such payments have been blocked by the west.
Iranians are not stupid. They will leave the oil in the ground rather than make adverse trades. They have a commodity that the whole world is hungry for.
Sir. It was not for nothing that India voted to refer Iran to UNSC. These sanctions are not about another Muslim Bomb, but about maintaining the financial system to which Iran is a threat and the Arabs are not. Arabs are hand in gloves with the financial managers to ensure that Oil price remains high to serve both their interest and also the interest of the financial managers of the world. These merchants of death care less if a few countries are destroyed and the world is put into danger by war hysteria in the bargain. They make their hay while the sun shines.
Both India and China will start looking for alternative suppliers for apart from Iran as incase of war the supply of oil from Iran will stop... so these countries have started reducing imports from Iran not because of sanction but risk involved... in the same place they are trying to take advantage to situation as well... The moves by these countries are closely watched by the world... as they are future SuperPowers....
Let me know your thoughts as well for the same...
It is very easy for the Western countries to persuade China and India to stop oil imports from Iran since they have other sources of Oil from countries such as Soudi Arabia which can make up for the loss of oil flow from Iran. If the US and European countries can guarantee oil supplies to India from sources other than Iran, then and only then India can adhere to the sanction regime of the UN. I don't think India and China can afford to sacrifice their economic growths by stopping importation of oil from Iran.
Please Email the Editor