FICCI is an influencer, not a lobby group: Mittal

March 08, 2010 04:06 pm | Updated 04:06 pm IST - New Delhi

The government’s job is to be a facilitator, and if they do that, there is no room for any lobbyist: FICCI President Rajan Mittal. File Photo

The government’s job is to be a facilitator, and if they do that, there is no room for any lobbyist: FICCI President Rajan Mittal. File Photo

Asserting that there is no need to introduce legalised-lobbying in India like in the U.S., industry body FICCI said that it is not a lobby group and worked only as an "influencer" to engage the government on policy issues.

“We have never been a lobby group, we are influencers.

“I don’t go and talk about (tinkering with duties), but wherever the industry gets impacted on policy matters, I think it is the job of chambers to go and engage the government,” FICCI’s newly elected President Rajan Mittal said.

On whether the government should introduce legalised-lobbying to get rid of the malice of informal corporate lobbying through use of money, he said: “The government’s job is to be a facilitator; that’s what they should do, and if they do that there is no room for any lobbyist.”

In the U.S., however, lobbying is legal and the industry sets apart a budget for this activity.

“If the government opens avenues, removes obstacles and roadblocks, why should you have a lobbyist,” Mittal asked.

Asked if he saw a role for FICCI in disciplining corporates in the face of reports of growing malpractices in fighting rivals and insider trading, Mittal said: “I don’t think we have any role to play, our role is there to look at policy matters.”

Mittal, however, said that the government needs to deal with such entities and the chamber would back such efforts.

“If the corporate does not behave, the government needs to come down strictly on them. We will always back the government and it’s not our role to play an intermediary for anybody,” Mittal added.

Asked if the proposed Companies Act was a step in the right direction to deal with such malpractices, he said: “It is a better step than before.”

When asked what else the Finance Minister could have done in the Union Budget 2010-11, Mittal said the government should have laid out a clear roadmap for FDI in retail and insurance.

Mittal added that the Finance Minister could have also extended more tax benefits for investments in sectors like agriculture, food processing and cold chains in the Budget.

On the role of chambers, he said they have to stop looking at only policies that impacts the industry and should play a greater role of catalyst for social and other sectors for taking the benefits of development to the lowest rung.

“We only look at the policy change, that’s good, that’s a great objective, but I think the forum has to step beyond that. Why should I (FICCI) not be more concerned about education and health services, which is actually going to be the challenge and a bane for the country’s growth (if proper emphasis is not laid upon them).”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.