Court approved merger schemes attract stamp duty in Delhi

February 10, 2010 08:56 pm | Updated 10:13 pm IST - CHENNAI

A Delhi High Court ruling that stamp duty is payable on a court order approving the scheme of arrangement/amalgamation under Section 394 of the Companies Act has put corporates in Tamil Nadu in a tricky situation.

The Delhi High Court ruling on stamp duty pertained to merger of 15 subsidiary outfits with Delhi Towers Ltd., the parent company. Though the merger was approved by the Delhi High Court, the administration in the national capital territory of Delhi refused to accept the scheme of amalgamation without the payment of stamp duty.

Consequently, Delhi Towers Ltd. moved the Delhi High Court and argued that a scheme of amalgamation approved by the Court could not be covered under the definition of ‘conveyance’ under sub-section 10 of Section 2 of the Indian Stamp Act of 1899. Hence, it went on to argue, “it is not eligible to stamp duty”. The Delhi High Court, however, ruled otherwise.

This ruling assumes larger dimension especially in view of the fact that Delhi (unlike States such as Maharashtra, Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh and Andhra Pradesh) has not amended its stamp duty laws to include court order approving a scheme of amalgamation under Section 394 of the Companies Act in the definition of ‘conveyance’. Like Delhi, Tamil Nadu too has not made any amendments to its stamp duty laws to include court orders in amalgamation cases in the definition of ‘conveyance’. The issue of applicability of stamp duty on the court order approving the scheme of arrangement/amalgamation has been under intense debate. Initially, corporate India took the position that court orders (approving amalgamations) are not ‘conveyance’ under the definition of stamp duty law. Hence, it argued that stamp duty is not payable on them. Some States amended their stamp duty laws specifically to include court order (approving amalgamations) under the definition of ‘conveyance’. Consequently, corporates have taken the view that stamp duty is payable only in States that have made a specific amendment to include court orders in their stamp duty laws.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.