Vodafone to go ahead with arbitration

July 10, 2014 04:25 pm | Updated 04:25 pm IST - Mumbai

A billboard advertisement of Vodafone. Vodafone, which is locked in a Rs 20,000-crore tax dispute, on Thursday said it will continue with the arbitration process as the government has decided not to drop retrospective tax laws in existing cases. File photo

A billboard advertisement of Vodafone. Vodafone, which is locked in a Rs 20,000-crore tax dispute, on Thursday said it will continue with the arbitration process as the government has decided not to drop retrospective tax laws in existing cases. File photo

Telecom major Vodafone, which is locked in a Rs 20,000-crore tax dispute, on Thursday said it will continue with the arbitration process as the government has decided not to drop retrospective tax laws in existing cases.

“We note the Finance Minister’s announcement that all existing cases arising from the 2012 retrospective tax law should follow the lawful process in which they are currently being adjudicated.

“Vodafone will, therefore, continue the process of international arbitration initiated under the India- Netherlands bilateral investment treaty,” the telecom major said in a statement soon after the Budget announcement.

While presenting the Budget, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said, “All the existing tax disputes, arising out of Retrospective Amendment to the Income Tax Act of 1961 and are pending in courts will be allowed to reach their logical conclusions. (But) this government will not ordinarily bring any change retrospectively which creates a fresh liability.”

He also noted that “the sovereign right of the government to undertake retrospective legislation is unquestionable. However, this power has to be exercised through extreme caution and judiciousness keeping in mind the impact of each such measure on the economy and the overall investment climate.”

Vodafone, which had won the tax case in the Supreme Court, said that “from the outset, we have maintained that there was no tax to pay, a view upheld by the Supreme Court, and the retrospective law in any case concerned tax on the gain made by Hutchison. Vodafone, as the buyer, clearly made no capital gain whatsoever.”

“The notion of a retrospective withholding obligation is both unjust, and as noted in the Shome report constitutes ’imposition of a burden of impossibility of performance’,” the company added.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.