Tribunal slaps curbs on Jignesh Shah, nine others

Cannot hold directorship in any firm, including 63 Moons

June 09, 2018 11:01 pm | Updated 11:01 pm IST

The Chennai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has declared Jignesh Shah and nine other directors ‘not fit and proper’ to be directors of any company, including 63 Moons (formerly known as Financial Technologies India Ltd) and its subsidiary National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL).

The order comes in response to a petition filed by the Union government in 2015, for superseding the board of 63 Moons for their alleged role in the ₹5,600 crore NSEL scam in 2013, which resulted in suspension of trading from the exchange.

According to the order, the 10 named persons cannot hold the directorship in any other company. The order also allows the government to nominate up to three directors to the board of 63 Moons to take care of the interest of all stakeholders and also to protect the interest of investment of 63 Moons in its subsidiaries.

The order was passed by the coram consisting of by CH. Mohd. Sharief Tariq, member (Judicial) and S. Vijayaraghavan, member (Technical), NCLT, Chennai.

“Shah and others have conducted themselves in a manner prejudicial to the public interest and the interests of the respondent companies (63 Moons, NSEL, MCX),” the coram said.

“As has been discussed, the actions of the respondents (Shah, the company and others) have shaken public confidence in the Indian Commodity markets. Their failure to exercise due diligence has resulted in the suspension of trade in NSEL and has had/will have adverse effects on the members and other stakeholders of the Financial Technologies also,” it added.

NCLT, however, provided relief to respondents who joined 63 Moons after trading was suspended on NSEL, citing that no allegations have been made against them.

“We are happy that NCLT has completely exonerated the present Board of 63 Moons....of all the baseless allegations of oppression and mismanagement,” 63 Moons said in a statement.

“In respect of past directors and new directors’ addition, while we are still analyzing the Order, on a quick review, it appears to be full of factual inaccuracies and inherent contradictions,” the company statement added.

The company said it is examining all legal options.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.