'Tata Tele’s licenses not covered in SC cancellation order'

July 03, 2013 07:40 pm | Updated July 23, 2016 08:24 pm IST - New Delhi

GUWAHATI02-02-2012A man makes a phone call in front of a Tata Docomo poster in Guwhati on Thursday, 02 February 2012. The Supreme Court India has cancelled all 122 2G licences on February 02, 2012. The Mobile Service providers (GSM/CDMA) that are set to lose on account of the cancellation of the licences are Uninor (joint venture between Unitech and Telenor of Norway), Loop Telecom, MTS India(Sistema Shyam TeleServices) Cheers Mobile  Etisalat DB (joint venture between Swan and Etisalat of UAE), S Tel, Videocon, Tatas and Idea Cellular. All these 122 licences issued by former telecom minister A Raja in January 2008 on firstcome firstserve basis. The companies can operate the quashed licenses for 4 months and TRAI has been asked to make fresh suggestions for grant of licenses.PHOTO: RITU_RAJ_KONWAR - caption

GUWAHATI02-02-2012A man makes a phone call in front of a Tata Docomo poster in Guwhati on Thursday, 02 February 2012. The Supreme Court India has cancelled all 122 2G licences on February 02, 2012. The Mobile Service providers (GSM/CDMA) that are set to lose on account of the cancellation of the licences are Uninor (joint venture between Unitech and Telenor of Norway), Loop Telecom, MTS India(Sistema Shyam TeleServices) Cheers Mobile Etisalat DB (joint venture between Swan and Etisalat of UAE), S Tel, Videocon, Tatas and Idea Cellular. All these 122 licences issued by former telecom minister A Raja in January 2008 on firstcome firstserve basis. The companies can operate the quashed licenses for 4 months and TRAI has been asked to make fresh suggestions for grant of licenses.PHOTO: RITU_RAJ_KONWAR - caption

Tata Teleservices’ 19 telecom permits are not included in the licences that Supreme Court found faulty and cancelled last year, according to a legal opinion sought by Department of Telecom.

Industry associations had represented to the government that the Supreme Court’s February 2012 order covered 141 telecom permits including 19 of Tatas, and not 122 2G licences.

Rejecting the views that Supreme Court order on 2G licences cancellation applied to 141 telecom permits, legal counsel representing government in the case said that court only cancelled 122 2G licences.

“The interpretation by various groups Assocham, TUG, COAI and MD, Idea Cellular of the judgement of February 2, 2012 of Hon’ble Supreme Court stating that 141 UAS licences ought to have been cancelled and not 122 licences as stated in TRAI recommendations is not correct,” Senior government counsel PP Rao, as per sources, told Department of Telecom.

Telecom User Group, GSM industry body COAI and Managing Director of Idea Cellular have written to DoT that the apex court judgement applied on 19 licences of Tata Teleservices as well and the total number of permits cancelled were 141 and not 122 as interpreted by government.

Assocham had later withdrew its representation on the matter.

Industry body Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India, which represents dual technology based services providers, has countered interpretation of judgement against GSM permits of TTSL.

Mr. Rao also said, “There is no mention in the judgement of quashing approval given for usage of dual technology spectrum to existing licences that were granted licence before the issuance of two press releases dated January 10, 2008. Both TRAI and DoT have correctly understood the meaning.”

The apex court in the judgement said “The licences granted to the private respondents on or after 10.1.2008 pursuant to two press releases issued on 10.1.2008 and subsequent allocation of spectrum to the licensees are declared illegal and are quashed.”

Sources said, Mr. Rao opined the first release of DoT issued on January 10, 2008 was for issuing letter of intent to telecom companies for new licences and the second press release request companies who have applied for dual technology spectrum to collect DoT’s response on the same day.

The opinion further said that “the apex court only cancelled licences that were granted on or after January 10, 2008 and there is no mention in the judgement of quashing approval given for usage of dual technology spectrum to existing licences that were granted licence before the issuance of the two press releases.”

However, no immediate comments were received from entities involved in the matter.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.