Supreme Court orders Subrata Roy's arrest

February 26, 2014 02:48 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 07:57 pm IST - New Delhi

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued non-bailable arrest warrant against Sahara founder Subrata Roy and asked him to appear before it on March 4. File photo

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued non-bailable arrest warrant against Sahara founder Subrata Roy and asked him to appear before it on March 4. File photo

The Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered the arrest of Sahara chief Subrata Roy for his failure to appear before it in connection with the Rs.19,000-crore deposits his company has not refunded to its investors.

It directed issuance of a non-bailable warrant for producing him in court at 2 p.m. on March 4.

A Bench of Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan and Justice J.S. Khehar took a serious view of Mr. Roy defying the court’s ordering him to appear before it and told senior counsel Ram Jethmalani: “The arms of this court are very long. Yesterday you made a similar request. We declined. Today you are making the same request. When other directors have appeared, why can’t he?”

Mother ailing

Mr. Jethmalani replied, “His [Mr. Roy’s] mother is seriously ill and he has to be with his mother, who is holding his hand. So much can be said on merit. But all I want to say is you [court] don’t require his presence today as the directors of the two companies are present.”

PTI adds:

The court had on February 20 come down heavily on the Sahara group for not refunding Rs 20,000 crore of investors money despite its order and summoned Roy, Ravi Shankar Dubey, Ashok Roy Choudhary and Vandana Bhargava, directors of its firms -- Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd (SIREC) and Sahara India Housing Investment Corp Ltd (SHIC) to be personally present before it today.

Mr. Jethmalani sought to explain Mr. Roy’s non-appearance by saying that he was sitting on the bed side of his ailing mother and holding her hand.

He also placed before the bench the medical certificate on Mr. Roy’s mother’s ill health and said on all earlier occasions, the Sahara Chief had complied with the apex court’s order.

However, the bench said, “for last two years we have been seeing what’s happening in the matter“.

The apex court had on Tuesday rejected Mr. Roy’s plea seeking exemption from personal appearance and had asked him to be present before it today.

The bench had made it clear that “rule of law” has to be maintained and Roy has to comply with its February 20 order in which he along with three directors of his companies have been summoned to appear.

During the hearing earlier, the bench had observed that SEBI could go ahead with the sale of properties of the group whose sale deeds were handed over to the market regulator to recover Rs 20,000 crore.

“Those properties you can sell. We allow you to sell them and recover the money. If they are encumbered properties then you can file criminal case against the company. The case must be brought to a logical conclusion,” the bench had said.

The bench had raised question on the way the group has been defying its order for the last one-and-a-half years.

The bench had said SEBI can put those properties on auction and get the money after the market regulator had said that let the company itself sell the properties and deposit the money.

The apex court in its judgement of August 31, 2012 had directed SEBI to attach properties and recover the money.

Sending a clear message that the court is not “helpless” in taking action for flouting its directions, the apex court had on November 21 last year barred Mr. Roy from leaving the country and also restrained the group from selling any of its properties.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.