Sahara asked to reveal source of Rs.22,885-crore ‘refund’

The apex court rapped Sahara chief Subrata Roy and the group for refusing to disclose the source of money

January 09, 2014 05:47 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 01:15 am IST - New Delhi

Supreme Court on Thursday asked Sahara India to provide all information sought by SEBI about their claim to have returned 90 per cent of Rs. 24,000 crore collected from investors. File photo

Supreme Court on Thursday asked Sahara India to provide all information sought by SEBI about their claim to have returned 90 per cent of Rs. 24,000 crore collected from investors. File photo

The Supreme Court on Thursday warned the Sahara Group to reveal the source of the Rs.22,885 crore with which it claimed it had refunded its investors, or be ready to face inquiry by the CBI and the Registrar of Companies.

Sending a clear message that the court is not “helpless” in taking action for flouting its directions, the apex court rapped Sahara chief Subrata Roy and the group for refusing to disclose the source of money.The apex court’s order barring Mr. Roy from leaving the country will also continue.

“Don’t think that the court is helpless. We can ask the CBI and the Registrar of Companies to conduct a probe against you. We are not helpless. We will find out the source of money if you don’t reveal it. We would ask the probe agencies to find out,” a Bench comprising Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and J.S. Khehar said.

The Bench expressed its disapproval when it was noted that Sahara had written a letter to SEBI saying the source of the money was “immaterial”. It said that the behaviour of the company and Mr. Roy was “obnoxious“.

“Someone from your company has the audacity to say that the source is immaterial. If you have refunded the money then you must have the record of the source from where you got the money. We cannot tell you how obnoxious has been the reply. Your behaviour has been amazing,” the Bench said, adding, “We have been polite and generous to you, but if you give us the stick, then what to do.”

The Bench said that thousands of crores of rupees were involved in this case and questioned how the registered companies were not maintaining the account.

“If you have maintained the account then you can find out the details of the source within 10 minutes,” the Bench said. “We showed maximum indulgence to you, but you never came out with the truth during the past two years. No matter what you do, you have to give the amount,” it said, observing, “If you have done a blunder then we can’t help you”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.