Competition Commission rejects complaint against SBI

April 03, 2014 05:24 pm | Updated May 21, 2016 08:02 am IST - New Delhi

In an order dated April 2, the Competition Commission of India held that as prima facie State Bank of India did not appear to be in a dominant position in the market for vehicle loans in India. File photo: V.V. Krishnan

In an order dated April 2, the Competition Commission of India held that as prima facie State Bank of India did not appear to be in a dominant position in the market for vehicle loans in India. File photo: V.V. Krishnan

Fair trade watchdog Competition Commission of India (CCI) has dismissed allegations that public sector lender State Bank of India (SBI) abused its dominant market position by imposing unreasonable and unfair conditions on car loan borrowers.

A complaint filed with CCI had alleged that SBI was abusing its dominant position by not informing car loan borrowers in advance about papers required to be signed for availing a loan and compelling them to sign various standard forms which contained one-sided terms.

In an order dated April 2, the CCI held that as prima facie SBI did not appear to be in a dominant position in the relevant market (the market for vehicle loans in India) “the question of abuse of dominant position by it does not arise”.

The Commission noted that vehicle loan market in India is largely competitive with the presence of many big players from public sector banks, private sector banks and foreign banks besides, non-banking finance companies and co-operative banks.

“In a highly competitive vehicle loan market, the presence of many large players itself indicates existence of enough competitive constraints to the opposite party (SBI) so as to exercise its dominance,” CCI said.

The complained was filed by one Ashok R. Mansata, who is the president of Concern for Citizens, a non-profit voluntary organisation.

According to the complainant, the borrowers of car loans had to sign standard forms in the presence of its officials within its premises.

It was stated that since a copy of the loan documents and forms, to be signed for availing a loan, is not given to the borrowers in advance, it was not possible for them to understand all the papers in front of SBI officials as a result the borrowers had no choice but to agree to the terms and conditions of the bank.

It was also alleged that SBI did not give the borrowers a copy of the documents signed by them.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.