Bombay HC to hear Kapur’s petition on Yes Bank Board seat on Monday

June 30, 2013 04:38 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 12:30 pm IST - Mumbai

The Bombay High Court will hear on Monday a petition filed by Madhu Kapur seeking a direction to Yes Bank’s board to take her daughter Shagun Kapur Gogia as a nominee director.

Ms Gogia was nominated by her mother Madhu Kapur as the legal heir to her deceased husband’s 12 per cent stake in the bank.

Madhu Kapur, widow of Yes Bank’s co-founder and promoter Ashok Kapur, has filed a suit in the Bombay High Court alleging that Rana Kapoor, co-founder and Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of the bank, and Mr. Kapur’s brother-in-law, is attempting to deprive her and her children of a place in the board.

Rana Kapoor, who owns 13.7 per cent in the bank, is the Managing Director and Chief Executive of the bank now.

The tussle began on June 6 when Madhu moved the Bombay High Court seeking to quash the appointment of three directors (Diwan Arun Nanda, Ravish Chopra and MR Srinivasan) on its board as well as to stall the AGM slated for June 8.

While hearing the case, Justice S J Kathawala had advised the warring families to resolve the dispute in an amicable manner, but did not stop the AGM. It asked the board to advance its July 22 meeting to June 27 and consider Madhu’s request for making her daughter Shagun a nominee director.

Accordingly the bank held its board meeting last Thursday. After the board meeting, the bank had issued a statement saying it would inform the Bombay High Court about the outcome of the board.

However, a letter addressed to Madhu by the board said: “The board of directors has unanimously agreed that the recommendation of Shagun Gogia made by you should not be accepted.”

The letter also said Rana Kapoor recused himself from the deliberations surrounding this issue both at the nominations and governance committee meeting and then at the overall board level.

When contacted, the bank’s spokesperson refused to comment saying “the matter is subjudice”.

While Gogia claims she has the right due to her status as legal heir, the bank argues that she may not pass muster with the RBI’s fit and proper criterion for bank directorship.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.