Restore balance in macroeconomy

The budget that will have to be presented by the new government within six weeks of taking oath of office will provide the first opportunity to address these issues.

May 16, 2014 11:41 pm | Updated May 23, 2016 04:57 pm IST

Economic growth has averaged around 4.7 per cent for the past two years. Gross fixed investment is at a standstill, barely increasing by 0.2 per cent in 2013-14 after a dismal growth of 0.8 per cent in 2012-13. Manufacturing output is now lower than it was a year ago. Despite collapsing growth, inflation has averaged 7.1 per cent per annum, suggestive of stagflation.

The high inflation is driven by agricultural prices, which have increased at an average 11.5 per cent despite a relatively high growth average of 3.1 per cent. The current account deficit shot up to 4.8 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) but has come down one to 1.8 per cent in 2013-14, partly due to restrictions on gold imports. This backdrop defines the immediate priorities of the incoming government.

The first priority of the new government must be to restore macro-economic balance. The second priority is to accelerate investment and growth. The third priority is to address the structural factors driving agricultural prices. The budget that will have to be presented by the new government within six weeks of taking oath of office will provide the first opportunity to address these issues.

Given the shortage of time, the budget can and must focus on those issues coming within the purview of the Finance Ministry. Two major objectives would, therefore, be to put the fiscal situation on a firm improving trend, and to address the problem of non-performing assets (NPAs) and capital adequacy of public sector banks (PSBs).

The BJP manifesto has promised a clear accounting of fiscal deficit. Based on this, they should aim to reach the FRBM (Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management) targets of three per cent for the fiscal deficit and zero per cent for the revenue deficit within two years with the objective of halving the difference from 2013-14 in each year. This requires a corresponding reduction in consumption expenditures and subsidies, particularly petroleum product-related subsidies.

It is quite clear to everyone that the damage done to corporate confidence by the retroactive changes in tax laws and harassment of corporate tax payers (what the BJP manifesto calls “Tax terrorism”), must be corrected. In addition, some progress must be shown with respect to implementation of Goods and Services Tax (GST) and simplification of income taxes. Given that several of the holdouts were BJP States, this should not be too difficult.

Another mistake made by the outgoing government was to force public sector banks to provide credit to infrastructure projects with less than adequate long-term financing. Given the high risks associated with bad policy and regulatory environment, several of these projects would not have got off the ground.

Forcing PSBs to provide credit merely postponed the day of reckoning in the form of non-performing assets. Re-capitalisation of these banks is, therefore, urgently required to revive their ability to lend to new borrowers. A policy change allowing government holding to go below 50 per cent will allow sale of government equity to finance re-capitalisation, without worsening the (real) fiscal deficit.

Finally, the disastrous management of the agriculture sector has resulted in almost 10 years of high farm price inflation. The minimum support pries must be restrained for the next few years, the huge build-up of stocks that has resulted in double-digit price increases in wheat and & cereal prices corrected. Steps must also be taken to reform the Food Corporation of India.

The likelihood of a below normal monsoon also makes it imperative to move quickly from the ad hoc changes in quantitative restrictions and export controls to a stable system of import tariffs and export duties.

This will help moderate price inflation, and provide an incentive to farmers to investin productivity improvement. Greater efforts must also be made to convince States to abolish the Administered Price Mechanism or remove vegetables and fruits from its purview. Separately, an independent review must be carried out of policy and regulations in the infrastructure and energy sectors under the purview of the Central Government and the governance of public sector and departmental enterprises. Hopefully, some action can be taken on these within three months after the budget has been passed.

(The author is former Chief Economic Advisor, Union Ministry of Finance)

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.