Pranab defends IT Act amendment with retrospective effect

March 31, 2012 04:05 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 11:20 pm IST - Kolkata

Union Minister for Finance, Pranab Mukherjee after delivering the speech at a special session on Union Budget organised by Calcutta Chamber of Commerce in Kolkata on Saturday. Photo: Arunangsu Roy Chowdhury

Union Minister for Finance, Pranab Mukherjee after delivering the speech at a special session on Union Budget organised by Calcutta Chamber of Commerce in Kolkata on Saturday. Photo: Arunangsu Roy Chowdhury

Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee on Saturday defended the move to amend the Income Tax Act with retrospective effect following which the U.K.’s Vodafone may have to pay Rs 11,000 crore as tax for a buyout deal involving Indian business.

“First the Supreme Court told in the Vodafone case that it has to be clearly indicated the intention of the legislature how it is going to tax,” Mr. Mukherjee said at an interactive session organised by Calcutta Chamber of Commerce.

“We came to the conclusion that we will not be able to tax on Indian assets purchased outside the country,” he added.

U.K.-based mobile operator Vodafone purchased Hong Kong-based Hutchison’s telecom business, which included operations in India, in 2007 for about USD 11.2 billion.

Indian income tax authorities said the deal will attract tax on it and sought Rs. 11,000 crore from Vodafone, which challenged the move.

The Supreme Court ruling held that Vodafone wasn’t liable to pay tax on the deal, following which the government has proposed to amend the tax laws retrospectively to bring in the net such deals.

“I will now pose few questions. We will have to decide whether India will be a no tax country or India will tax ... If the answer is yes that it will be taxed, then whether to be taxed in India or at source of the company. Then comes the question how it is being protected from Double Tax Avoidance Agreement and tax exchange information in India”, Mr. Mukherjee said.

The legal remedy lay in bringing clarified amendments and make clear the intention of the legislature, he added.

Mr. Mukherjee said the government’s concern was to get its due share. “If I want to clarify the intention of the legislature in respect of particular section passed in a particular year, the relevant year is only that year,” he said.

“But this does not mean that it gives the opportunity to reopen the cases from 1962. There is the other provision that no IT cases can be re-opened beyond six years,” the Union Finance Minister said.

The Income Tax Act came into force from 1962.

Mr. Mukherjee also said he had instructed the officers to examine the transfer pricing mechanism so that no one was harassed.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.