APEC Economic Ministers vow to offset EU woes with growth

November 11, 2011 07:36 am | Updated November 17, 2021 06:41 am IST - HONOLULU

Finance Ministers and officials pose for the offcial photo during the APEC Summit in Honolulu on Thursday.

Finance Ministers and officials pose for the offcial photo during the APEC Summit in Honolulu on Thursday.

Asia-Pacific finance ministers agreed to push ahead with efforts to boost growth and trade, and to fend off financial crisis through reforms, U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Thursday.

The government debt crisis in Europe remains the central challenge to global growth, Mr. Geithner said ahead of a Pacific Rim summit this weekend that encompasses economic giants such as the U.S. and China and small nations including New Zealand and Papua New Guinea.

“It is crucial that Europe move quickly to put in place a strong plan to restore financial stability,” he said. “They’re moving ahead, but we just need them to move ahead more quickly and with more force behind it.”

The finance ministers from the 21 economies that make up the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum discussed ways to re-energize economic growth and create jobs through practical measures such as investment in infrastructure and reforms aimed at providing more access to financing for the poor.

“We need to take reforms that will help reinforce growth now, as well as make long-term reforms that will help us sustain growth in the future,” Mr. Geithner said.

Officials gathering in Hawaii for the annual APEC meeting also hope to build support for a comprehensive regional free trade pact to help drive growth and stave off the type of financial woes afflicting Europe. The European Union has warned that the 17 countries that use the euro common currency could slip into “a deep and prolonged recession” next year as the debt crisis shows alarming signs of spinning out of control.

On the trade front, word is awaited from Japan, the world’s third biggest economy, on whether it will join efforts to forge the Pacific-wide free trade zone, encompassing more than half the world’s economic output.

Region wide, there is growing interest in the plan, called the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which Washington believes “could become a valuable tool toward anchoring us in the region and building the next generation trade model, from the ground up,” U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk said in an interview.

American officials hosting the APEC meeting voiced their determination to deepen U.S. engagement in the region. Asia-Pacific nations are increasingly wary of China’s growing economic and political clout, and hope U.S. influence will continue to provide a counterbalance.

“Today, there is a need for a more dynamic and durable trans-Pacific system a more mature security and economic architecture that will promote security, prosperity, and universal values,” Secretary of State Hillary Ms. Clinton said in a speech on Thursday at the East-West Centre, a government supported think-tank in Honolulu. “We need to seize new opportunities for trade and investment to create jobs and fuel our economic recovery at home.”

APEC’s scope encompasses a wide range of issues, including climate change, energy and food security, and politics. But its main focus remains growth through trade and closer economic ties among Pacific Rim nations from Chile to China.

That mission dovetails with President Barack Obama’s efforts to spotlight U.S. progress on boosting exports.

APEC is more than just talk, said Kirk.

“It’s been a really good laboratory for trade liberalization,” he said. The emphasis now, is real economic integration and “putting meat on the bones behind that.”

Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda was expected to make an announcement Friday on whether his government would join negotiations for the Pacific free trade area. The U.S., Australia, Malaysia, Vietnam and Peru are negotiating to join the grouping, which already brings together the smaller economies of Chile, New Zealand, Brunei and Singapore.

Japan’s debate on joining the pact was sidetracked by the March 11 earthquake and tsunami disaster. The ruling party is split, with supporters pushing membership as a way to revive the sagging economy, while opponents complain it would hurt key sectors like farming by opening them to more foreign competition.

Bringing onboard other big regional powers such as Japan and China, the world’s third and second—largest economies, would vastly expand the bloc’s scope and impact.

The U.S. recently clinched long-sought free trade pacts with South Korea, Colombia, and Panama agreements that if ratified will bring to 20 the number of countries that have free trade agreements with the U.S.

Such arrangements are potentially worth billions to American exporters, and thousands of new jobs. Despite a recent surge in exports, the U.S. share in Asian international trade has fallen 9 percent since 1990 as other nations have set trading agreements among themselves.

In Honolulu, Washington was keeping up pressure on China to commit to faster trade liberalization and to freeing its currency, which U.S. officials say remains undervalued relative to its neighbors’ even though it has gained substantially against the U.S. dollar in recent years.

A senior U.S. Treasury official said Wednesday that officials were largely agreed on the need to push ahead with reducing trade gaps, especially through flexible management of exchange rates. China’s willingness to make that commitment both in Cannes and in Honolulu could encourage similar moves by other Asia—Pacific economies, he said.

But Beijing’s apparent openness to move faster on its currency policy was not matched by similar support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which earlier this week a senior official in Beijing described as “overly ambitious.”

Kirk shrugged off suggestions by some analysts that China might use competing arrangements with Asian trading partners to challenge the U.S.-backed free trade bloc.

“Well then, China can stay on the sidelines and watch us build the most dynamic trade partnership in the Asia-Pacific,” Kirk said. “If China believes this is too ambitious, that’s a decision for China to make.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.