Books » Reviews

Updated: February 19, 2013 08:36 IST

Making sense of a war

B. Muralidhar Reddy
Comment (7)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Still Counting The Dead — Survivors of Sri Lanka’s Hidden War: Frances Harrison; Portobello Books, London.
Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd., 11, Community Centre, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi-110017. Rs. 399.
Still Counting The Dead — Survivors of Sri Lanka’s Hidden War: Frances Harrison; Portobello Books, London. Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd., 11, Community Centre, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi-110017. Rs. 399.

It would be four years in May this year since the Sri Lankan forces succeeded in military annihilation of the LTTE. The victory came at a heavy cost as thousands and thousands of innocent Tamil civilians caught in the war zone became collateral damage. Sadly till date there are no clear answers on the magnitude of the humanitarian tragedy and the culpability of the victors and the vanquished.

This book by a former BBC correspondent Frances Harrison, who had a four-year stint in the island nation from 2000 to 2004, is a valuable source material to the literature on the four decades of ethnic conflict as it seeks to fill several gaps on what could have gone on in the last five months of war from the perspective of LTTE activists/sympathisers as well as innocent civilians.

The book has ten chapters, besides the introduction and the author’s conclusions. Each chapter recounts gripping ‘tales’ of the battle zone as narrated by a UN official, pro-LTTE TamilNet journalist, the head of the LTTE Peace Secretariat (Pulidevan) who got killed under controversial circumstances presumably on the last but one day of the war, a government doctor, a nun, a teacher, an LTTE media department woman functionary with two children, an LTTE fighter, a shopkeeper and a rape victim married to an LTTE fighter.

Significantly, all the actors in the book barring the deceased Pulidevan identified as the ‘spokesman’ have managed to buy their way out of the island nation by heavily bribing the corrupt military, police and bureaucracy.

The sub-title of the book ‘Survivors of Sri Lanka’s Hidden war’ leaves no scope for ambiguity on the conviction of the author, which echoes the sentiments of most westerners, that it was a ‘war without a witness’.

Call it conceit/naivety/notions of self importance, the author notes with smugness that nobody has told the tales of the victims: there were simply no international journalists or aid workers in the war zone in the final months to send harrowing accounts of civilian suffering to CNN or BBC. It is time for these conscience keepers to beef up their bureaus in conflict zones like Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria as part of their mission to minimise humanitarian tragedies.

Ms. Harrison’s belief is rooted on the premise that after the UN was forced to leave the war zone in the third week of September 2008, the Lankan forces and the Tigers abandoned the rules of engagement and civilians were fair game for both the parties. The assumption is flawed as in this era of satellite technology and Google mapping it is not easy for the regimes and non-state actors to get away with slaughter and mayhem.

To the credit of the author it must be said that at the very beginning she acknowledges the limitations of the book by clearly identifying its theme, prejudices of the narrators and the chief objective behind the endeavour.

In her own words, “It is a not history of the whole war and does not tell the suffering of the ordinary soldier or Sinhalese commuter living in fear of bomb blasts — that is the (entirely legitimate) subject for another book. It is an account of the victory from the perspective of the defeated.”

Failure of UN

The author is unsparing in her outright condemnation of the international community for their alignment without any qualms, in the last months of the war, with the Sri Lankan government led by President Mahinda Rajapaksa, leaving 400,000 civilians to the mercy of the forces and the Tigers. However, she conveniently skips as to why the world chose to do so and how the LTTE was proscribed by more countries than Al-Qaeda.

The account by the UN official lays bare the serious limitations of the organisation in a complex conflict zone like Sri Lanka where the rebels were in possession of nearly one-third of the land mass and two-thirds of the sea of the island at some point of time. When what is referred to Eelam War-IV began in July 2006, the Tigers were in control of 12,000 kilometres of land.

Some aspects unveiled by the official show the utter callousness on the part of some of the UN staff. Recounting the scenes on the day the staffers were preparing to leave he says, “Soon the aid workers were having a party, cracking open cold beers and congratulating each other on getting out safely”. Ms. Harrison does not hide that the LTTE Peace Secretariat head was her source, friend and confidant. By her own account the lines of her role got blurred.

“For months I’d been asking Puli what the Tigers planned to do, as they lost one town after another … I talked repeatedly of surrender but it was clear, it was taboo”, she writes. At another place she concedes her admiration. Talking of him she says, “These are the qualities of a good spokesman, ultimately they cost him his life”.

Some of the questions raised by the civilians in the war zone are mind-boggling. An enraged teacher, whose version figures in chapter six, asks stunned Red Cross workers who had come as part of the mission to evacuate the injured, disturbing questions on the role and rationale of the international organisations and aid workers in a conflict zone.The book by its very nature is a series of narratives of different actors in the war theatre. But the question is can the macro accounts of harrowing tales of ten players be juxtaposed to the micro level. By getting into the contentious issue of causalities Ms. Harrison has left scope for such a possibility.

The figures are all muddled and make no sense. She quotes a UN estimate of 100,000 dead in the four decades of Sri Lanka’s war. There is no clarity whether it includes Tamil and Sinhalese civilians, the LTTE cadres and the security forces. She jumps from an estimate to another on the civilian causalities in the territory under the Tiger control in the last phases of war.

She says, “Experts for the UN concluded later that the overall casualties were extremely high and a death toll of 40,000 could not be ruled out”. There is no elaboration as to who the experts are, where have they put the figure and the basis on which they have arrived at the conclusion.

Later she goes on to say, “The death toll could be 55,000 if the population figure for January 2009, given by a senior civil a senior is used. A Tamil Catholic bishop did the sums using the government’s own population data for the late 2008 and found 146,679 people unaccounted for”. At another place the author writes, “Simple mathematics leaves anywhere from 26,000 to 146,679 people unaccounted for, presumably dead”.

There are a few other oddities in the book which are surprising coming from a seasoned journalist. In the fourth chapter on the government doctor in the war zone she notes, “Even though the northern jungles had been under rebel administration for years, such was the power of the government bureaucracy that it still deployed doctors and civil servants in these areas”. The government functionaries were actually another buffer for the LTTE.

Still Counting The Dead — Survivors of Sri Lanka’s Hidden War: Frances Harrison;

Portobello Books, London.

Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd., 11, Community Centre, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi-110017.

Rs. 399.

More In: Reviews | Books

We are waiting for the other book, about the killing of innocent civilians in the suicide attacks on the Central Bank , Temple of the Tooth relic in Kandy, Massacre at Bodhi tree in Anuradhapura, massacre of the muslim worshippers in the eastern province, attack on buses carrying civilians, attack on trains carrying civilians, massacre of farmers living in the border villages of the north east sri lanka and many others. and last but not the killing of Rajiv Gandhi who was none other than a former prime minister of india and a grandson of Sri jawahallal nehru, the first prime minister of independent india.

from:  Jeewan
Posted on: Feb 21, 2013 at 12:42 IST

As a Sri lankan still living this small island , we knew what kind of suffering we gone through last 30 years. All moderate tamils and sinhalese were killed. No one raised a single word agianst LTTE barbarics.

How many our loved ones were died, i still can remmber the , kids are not going to school people are not going to work on Prabakaran's birthday. Because we are very sure LTTE will going to bomb in public places to celebrate their leader's birthday.

No India or IC spoke. Finally country got the leader who determined to destroy this menace.

Now tamil living abroad wake up from their EElam dreams.
They still cannot realize , LTTE defeated.
and western do not want to see a peace in south asia , same as middle east.

thas why all these nonsense , but sri lankan will never allow to anyone to drag this country to a blood bath.

from:  dwickra
Posted on: Feb 21, 2013 at 08:39 IST

@ Amit,

After reading your comment I came to understanding that all you care is
for separate homeland. You never wanted to live in harmony with other
groups. You asked what to do if marriage don't work out, Guess what

from:  David
Posted on: Feb 21, 2013 at 06:09 IST

At least there is some sort of disclaimer from the author about the
accuracy of the information, authenticity of the sources and their
affiliation. But the critic hasn't provided any authentic data to
refute the figures quoted by the author and I wonder on what basis the
critic concludes that the casualty figures in the book are skewed up.
The world cannot deny the atrocities and war crimes committed by the
SL army during the end days of the war. There is sufficient data
available from the account of eye witnesses from UN observers and Red
cross workers who were in the war zone to substantiate the claims made
in the book. Simply put, the article doubts the very intensity of the
war crimes committed by the army and supports Sri Lankan government's
propoganda to cover their crime. I honestly doubt the intention of
this article, it seems to be biased and one sided.

from:  Arun
Posted on: Feb 20, 2013 at 11:47 IST

Dear Readers, there are good writers and writers who write about the sufferings of innocent people and make money. Frances Harrison is one of those writers who is now trying to make money with her book. No one believes her stories, even though it happened and innocent lives were killed. She wrote about the atrocities of the army but forgot the human death toll of the conflict

from:  Nadesan Pillai
Posted on: Feb 20, 2013 at 02:06 IST

Dear Mother India and IC,
We, SL Tamils, have had enough since the independence at the hands of majority Sinhalese regimes. Clearly we have two options here.
1. Force SL Govt to move away from Triumphalism and share power with the ethnic minorities not only Tamils but also Muslims. The last thing we need is the Tamil-Muslim or Sinhala-Muslim conflict since the end of of the war.
2. You all have been trying with the above for years- you count. Again, Rajapaksas will never allow for many reasons including war crimes, the only option Tamils have is to secede and create an Independent Tamil nation ensuring the minority rights.
I'm not a secessionist but if marriage doesn't work, what would you do?

from:  Amit
Posted on: Feb 19, 2013 at 18:15 IST

The author is at least civil enough to add a disclaimer on his political view and whose point
of view the narration in the book is. It is a pity that the critic has not bothered to declare his
affiliations. A well balanced critique is one that identifies both the positives and negatives
from multiple perspectives, so that the appropriate reader segments can choose if they want
to buy the book. It is sad that this book critic has taken the role of spokesperson of Gotabaya
to defend the indefensible. The author has given multiple figures on the casualty in the war
as quoted by several sources. The sources themselves are basing their estimates on
secondary data and third party accounts. There is no nirvana truth on the number of
casualties, because no one was there to monitor, and the killed were too busy fleeing, and
the killers didn't bother to do a body count. So by questioning the veracity of citing several
sources, does the critic question the veracity of killings themselves ?

from:  S sivakumar
Posted on: Feb 19, 2013 at 08:07 IST
Show all comments
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor



Recent Article in Reviews

Monetary policy, before and after crisis

The Great Recession which set in in 2007-08 claimed several victims on its way. Global banks considered “too-big-to-fall” looked meek. T... »