![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Thursday, Nov 05, 2009 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| National |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
National
NEW DELHI: Chief Secretary of the Uttar Pradesh government Atul Kumar Gupta appeared in the Supreme Court on Wednesday in the contempt case relating to alleged violation of orders restraining construction at memorial sites in Lucknow. The court on October 6 issued notice to him to show cause as to why contempt of court proceedings should not be initiated against him for violating the restraint orders. In his response, Mr. Gupta tendered an unqualified apology for any kind of disobedience or deviation, aberration or misconstruction, which might have happened in implementing the orders. When the matter was taken up before a Bench comprising Justices H.S. Bedi and J.M. Panchal, senior counsel for the State R.N. Trivedi, submitted that the Chief Secretary was present and that his future appearance could be dispensed with. Brief orderWhen senior counsel Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for petitioner Mithilesh Kumar Singh, insisted that the Chief Secretary be asked to be remain present on every occasion, Justice Bedi said “he had already apologised. We will ask him to come as and when required.” The Bench, in its brief order, dispensed with the personal appearance of the Chief Secretary until further orders and issued notice to the petitioner to respond to the fresh application of the government seeking a direction to lift the stay on construction activities and to respond to the Chief Secretary’s reply in the contempt matter. It directed the matter to be listed for further hearing on November 30. In its application, the government sought lifting the stay on construction activities stating that in view of the interim orders, it had become quite impossible to carry out even the repairs and maintenance work in respect of various properties “which are the subject matter of nine writ petitions.” Since these sthals had been dedicated to the nation and open to the public, it was necessary to carry out repairs as might be required from time to time, it said.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |
Copyright © 2009, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|