![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, Jul 08, 2009 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Kerala |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Kerala
Directive was that decisions should be taken on complaints only collectively, not individually RTI groups start Web campaign against order KOCHI: A Central government directive that the information commissions set up under the Right to Information Act (RTI) should take decisions on complaints and appeals from the public collectively, and not individually, has RTI activists up in arms. RTI activists around the country have strongly objected to the directive and launched an Internet campaign to get it rescinded. They fear the directive will further weaken the institution of RTI and lead to the piling up of complaints and appeals before the commissions, thus causing the degeneration of the institution. Last month, the Department of Personnel and Training in the Union Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions wrote to the Central Information Commission saying that the CIC and the State Information Commissions were not supposed to take decisions by constituting Benches of individual commissioners, but as a single body. It noted that the Department of Legal Affairs, which it consulted, had opined that ‘Section 12(4)of the RTI Act does not empower the Chief Information Commissioner to constitute the Benches.’ “In view of this legal position, it is advised that decisions on the complaints and appeals should be taken by the Central Information Commission as defined in Section 2(b) of the RTI Act 2005, and not by the Benches of the commission.” “Impractical”RTI activists dub the directive as “laughable, impractical and issued without first having done any field work.” They point out that all the information commissions in the country are flooded with complaints and appeals and that the commissions, even with the current functioning of Benches, are struggling to deal with them. Each of the commissions in the States has between three and ten commissioners and also a chief information commissioner. Position in KeralaIn Kerala, for instance, there are three commissioners and a chief commissioner. They hear complaints individually (as four separate ‘Benches’) in the same way as High Court judges function. If the new directive is implemented, the three commissioners and the chief commissioner will have to sit together and take decisions jointly. This will mean that only one fourth of the number of complaints currently heard will be taken up for hearing. This will mean that the effectiveness of the commission is reduced to one-fourth.
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |
Copyright © 2009, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|