![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sport |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Sport
A BIG WICKET: Matt Prior and Ian Bell successfully appeal for a leg before decision against Sachin Tendulkar on Saturday. Mohali: The deeply introspective Rahul Dravid poses the toughest questions to himself. The Indian batting great answered one of them — on what he still offered to this Indian team — when he flicked James Anderson for a single and completed his 26th Test hundred. “It was more about what I expected out of myself,” he said later. Dravid’s 136 — ending an extended dry run — was an innings of technique and heart. On another murky day, his spirit shone bright. India’s most successful No. 3’s value to the line-up in conditions favouring seam and swing is immense. Gautam Gambhir continues to impress. The left-hander was fortunate early on but applied himself. The opener’s 179 reflected his growing maturity. Other’s failApart from their 314-run second-wicket stand — India’s second highest partnership for any wicket against England — the home team’s batting offered little on Saturday. India slumped from 320 for one to 453 all out in its first innings on the second day of the second Test at the PCA Stadium. England’s fightback was led by Andrew Flintoff and Greame Swann. The zestful Flintoff extracted bounce and seamed the ball both ways from an off-stump line on a pitch with a greenish tinge. Off-spinner Swann spun the ball into the right-hander or away from the southpaw. He also straightened the odd one or drifted it into the left-hander from round-the-wicket; Swann pivots well, has a side-on action, and imparts revolution on the ball. Swing bowler James Anderson was unlucky while Stuart Broad should have pitched the ball further up. Left-arm spinner Monty Panesar operated with greater control in the last session. Kevin Pietersen’s field-placement for the spinners showed an improvement; there were more men to cut off singles and hold miscued drives. In the context of his form being under intense scrutiny, this was a significant innings from Dravid (136, 328b, 19x4). He entered ‘the zone’; a territory where his mind and body are in harmony. Admirable judgmentFor most part, Dravid’s judgment — his stance and balance were in order — around the off-stump was admirable. He played and left, covering for the possible inward movement. Whether getting a big stride forward or going right back, he was decisive in his footwork. The duel between Dravid and Flintoff was engrossing. When the Englishman bounced, Dravid swayed out of harm’s way with his eyes on the ball. On those rare occasions when he was unsure about the direction of movement, Dravid loosened his grip on the handle; even if the edge was found, the ball would not carry to the cordon. For most part, he watched the bowler’s hand closely to pick the deviation. Dravid celebrated a well-constructed hundred in a typically understated fashion and carried on. A push-drive past bowler Broad had the small gathering applauding. Dravid used the depth of the crease effectively for the back-footed strokes off the spinners. Gambhir began aggressively against Panesar but was given a few anxious moments by Anderson with the second new ball. The left-hander, however, seized on the scoring opportunities; he cut and pulled the pacemen to the fence. Gambhir went past 1,000 Test runs for the year and then the 150-run mark. He was eventually consumed by Swann, slicing a wide delivery. Soon, Dravid, seeking to push the scoring, was held at mid-off off Swann. Wickets tumbleWickets then fell in a heap. Tendulkar missed a sweep to an off-spinner from Swann and V.V.S. Laxman was done in by one that nipped back from Flintoff; the all-rounder’s post lunch spell of 6-3-3-1 was an inspired one. Yuvraj was put down early at gully by Alastair Cook off Flintoff. The pace-bowling all-rounder tested the left-handed Yuvraj with a combination of lifting deliveries and the ones deviating away from round-the-wicket. Yuvraj was not always convincing. Neither Yuvraj — miscuing an attempted flick off Panesar — nor Dhoni — stepping out to Anderson and holing out — could consolidate. There were a few enterprising blows from the lower order but England kept striking. It was a good comeback by Pietersen’s men. SCOREBOARD Australia -1st innings: 375. South Africa - 1st innings: 281. Australia - 2nd innings: M. Hayden c & b Steyn 4, S. Katich c Boucher b Kallis 37, R. Ponting c Boucher b Harris 32, M. Hussey b Ntini 8, M. Clarke c Kallis b Steyn 25, A. Symonds c Smith b Harris 37, B. Haddin st. Boucher b Harris 94, B. Lee c de Villiers b Kallis 5, J. Krejza c de Villiers b Kallis 32, M. Johnson c Kallis b Morkel 21, P. Siddle (not out) 4, Extras (b-4, lb-7, w-2, nb-7) 20; Total (in 97 overs) 319.Fall of wickets: 1-25, 2-59, 3-88, 4-88, 5-148, 6-157, 7-162, 8-241, 9- 278. South Africa bowling: Steyn 19-3- 81-2, Ntini 21-2-76-1, Harris 27-3- 85-3, Kallis 14-4-24-3, Morkel 16-4- 42-1. South Africa - 2nd innings: G. Smith lbw b Johnson 108, N. McKenzie c Haddin b Johnson 10, H. Amla c Haddin b Lee 53, J. Kallis (batting) 33, A.B. de Villiers (batting) 11, Extras (b-4, lb-5, w-1, nb-2) 12; Total (for three wkts. in 64 overs) 227. Fall of wickets: 1-19, 2-172, 3-179. Australia bowling: Lee 16-3-40-1, Johnson 19-3-56-2, Siddle 14-0-56-0, Krejza 15-1-66-0
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Ergo | Home |
Copyright © 2008, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|