The Hindu : Sport / Cricket : Gilchrist calls Murali a chucker

Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Nov 05, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version

Sport

Sport - Cricket

Gilchrist calls Murali a chucker

Muttiah Muralitharan

Sydney: Former Australian vice-captain Adam Gilchrist has stirred up a hornet’s nest by calling spin wizard Muttiah Muralitharan a chucker and accusing Sri Lankan authorities of splitting the cricket world between ‘white’ and ‘black’ countries in the ’90s.

Gilchrist, in his autobiography ‘True Colours’, minced no words in saying Muralitharan chucked the ball and alleged that the International Cricket Council protected him after Sri Lankan authorities interpreted questioning of his bowling action as a ‘racial attack’.

“Does Murali chuck the ball?’ ... I thought for a few moments, and then said, cautiously: ‘I think he does’,” Gilchrist said referring to a question posed to him.

“I say that because, if you read the laws of the game, there’s no doubt in my mind that he and many others throughout cricket history have,” he wrote.

The former Australian vice-captain lamented that the ICC changed the rules to accommodate Murali instead of rectifying his fault when he was first caught for the offence in mid ’90s.

“I will take opportunity to clarify what I think about Murali and his action. I don’t back away from what I said... (But) I don’t think he’s personally to blame: he bowled the way he bowled, and it was not up to him to do anymore than he was asked.”

Gilchrist also said he was sure not many in international cricket accepted the theory of optical illusion proposed just to bail Murali out.

“...there is no doubt in my mind that his arm did straighten more than the rules allowed when he started playing Test cricket in the mid-1990s... I have heard the theories about optical illusion but I don’t buy them... It should have been dealt with back in 1995-96 when Darrell Hair and Ross Emerson no-balled him in Australia,” Gilchrist said.

The former stumper felt the real issue of suspect bowling action was overshadowed when Sri Lankan authorities gave the whole episode colour of racial vilification. “But the real issue — does he straighten his arm? — was rail-roaded by Sri Lankan cricket authorities, an Arjuna Ranatunga, turning it into a debate over race. They were threatening a walkout, and there was talk of a split in the game between ‘white’ and ‘black’ countries, because the questioning of Murali’s action was interpreted as a racial attack. — PTI

Printer friendly page
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Sport