![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Monday, Jun 16, 2008 ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
![]() |
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
This refers to the article “‘War’ against Indian state: real victims & outcome” (June 12). The insurgencies in the northeast have proved beyond doubt that the Indian state cannot control the region without employing brute force. The Mizo insurgency could be suppressed only because the Mizos are a small population of a few lakhs. But even today, Mizoram is virtually sovereign. The youth can impose a non-tribal curfew at will. The failure of the Centre to defeat the Naga insurgency even after 45 years of its formation (1963) should open our eyes to the fact that it is not easy to defeat a large community when it rebels. The large-scale state violence in the northeast raises serious questions about its political authority. Apurba K. Baruah, Shillong
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2008, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|