Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Thursday, Mar 13, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



National
The Hindu E-paper

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

National Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Sabharwal murder trial shifted to court in Nagpur

J. Venkatesan

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday transferred the trial of the case relating to the death of H.S. Sabharwal in August 2006 during the student union elections in Ujjain in Madhya Pradesh to a court in Nagpur.

Acting on a petition from Himanshu Sabharwal, a Bench of Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice P. Sathasivam shifted the trial out of a court in Madhya Pradesh following an apprehension that the trial if held in Madhya Pradesh would not be free and fair.

No mere spectator

The Bench in its judgment said: “If a criminal court is to be an effective instrument in dispensing justice, the Presiding Judge must cease to be a spectator and a mere recording machine by becoming a participant in the trial, evincing intelligence, active interest and elicit all relevant materials necessary for reaching the correct conclusion to find out the truth and administer justice.”

Writing the judgment, Mr. Justice Pasayat said: “Courts administering criminal justice cannot turn a blind eye to vexatious or oppressive conduct that has occurred in relation to proceedings, even if a fair trial is still possible, except at the risk of undermining the fair name and standing of the judges as impartial and independent adjudicators.”

On fair trial

The Bench said: “Fair trial obviously would mean a trial before an impartial judge, a fair prosecutor and atmosphere of judicial calm. Fair trial means a trial in which bias or prejudice for or against the accused, the witnesses, or the cause which is being tried is eliminated. If witnesses get threatened or are forced to give false evidence that also would not result in a fair trial. The failure to hear material witnesses is certainly denial of fair trial.”

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



National

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu