Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Wednesday, Mar 12, 2008
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version
Google



Opinion
The Hindu E-paper

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Opinion - Letters to the Editor Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Farm loan waiver

The article “Oh! What a lovely waiver” (March 10) has examined the true impact of the Rs.60,000 crore waiver of farm loans on debt-ridden farmers. It has exposed the UPA government’s motive behind the timing of the waiver. That nothing has been done to mitigate the debt situation of farmers who have borrowed from moneylenders, and to distinguish dry land farmers of Vidharbha from other farmers, has rendered the waiver ineffective in addressing the immediate and long-term agrarian crisis.

J. Jayashankar,
Mayiladuthurai

The waiver does not cover small farmers who are heavily indebted to moneylenders. As the article clearly points out, Rs.60,000 crore is not as huge a figure as it is projected to be because banks write off such money as bad debts periodically. The government need not search for funds for the waiver and impose a cess on this pretext.

N. Suryanarayanan,
Chennai

The article has brilliantly exposed the hype surrounding the “unprecedented” loan waiver scheme. Dry lands are the worst-hit by the agrarian crisis and deserve special treatment. It is common knowledge that farming is of little viability on small holdings in dry lands. An overwhelming majority of farmers would, therefore, own more than 2 hectares of land. Curiously, the UPA government failed to take cognisance of this simple fact.

B. Jayanna Krupakar,
Surathkal

The reality about the so-called benedictory farm loan waiver is interesting. The waiver is an outcome of electionomics and is quite superficial in its approach. As for the corporate sector’s hue and cry over the budget being pro-farmer, it must understand that India wishes to achieve inclusive growth and bridge the gap between India and Bharat. I wonder why our corporates overlook the fact that even capitalist countries like the U.S. provide huge subsidies to their farm sectors.

Preeti Sharma,
Bareilly

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Opinion

News: ePaper | Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Retail Plus | Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2008, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu