![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, Feb 13, 2007 ePaper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
This refers to the report that theatre owners of Gujarat have decided not to screen Parzania in the State, fearing disturbances (Feb. 7). Earlier the fringe Hindutva elements stalled the screening of Aamir Khan's film Fanaa. Now there is an unofficial ban on Parzania, which is based on the disappearance of a young boy during the Gujarat riots. When the film has already been cleared by the Censor Board, such a ban is unwarranted and is, in fact, illegal. One wonders whether Gujarat is not part of India.
K.S. Sundaram,
The film reminds the people of the communal riots. Gujarat is peaceful now and is among the most advanced States. What is the need to remind the people of the riots, which are best forgotten? The theatre owners' decision not to screen the film is welcome. In fact, peace-loving people should, on their own accord, refuse to see the film. It is the Gandhian way of refusing to look at the distorting of facts.
K.G. Acharya,
Printer friendly
page
News:
ePaper |
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2007, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|